I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>537
Cut the bullshit. If you didn't care you wouldn't have brought it up.

Anyway: My comments were meant to be inflammatory. When I look at this thread it occurs to me that a majority of the white supremist I argued against for some reason thought they could ignore what we know about modern history. They tried to ignore what we know about intelligence and gentics. And that's why the argument drifted right off in the fucking abyss when I said: "It's never nurture or nature in an arguement about IQ/race".

I came armed with a shield made out of skin that flaked off the the God of absolute truth. In my right hand was a sword crafted from the strongest object in the universe: My penis. That shit was forged with lazers and nuclear energy.

You guys came in here with your high school diplomas, your virginity and your obsession with racial slurs. And the resaon I made the comments I did was because I made the distiction between white supremists and those who just wanted to debate properly.

Anyone on here that tries to lord the "many accomplishment of the whites" over you or your race is a white supremist.
Any one here that tries to make their race seem genetically superior when compared to *any* another race is a white supremist. Any one here that exhibits this inate fear of the extention of their so-called race is a white supremist.

And you know how I know this? Because if take the last paragraph and exchange white for black- you get a list of what a white supremist simply DOES NOT want to hear or accept. The idea that they didn't invent everything and they weren't the orginator of all these neat ideas they hold so dear.