I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>467

It's this fucking delusional, bi-polar thinking of yours that strikes me as ignorant. So who's putting words in someone's mouth again?

I have made no claim that blacks were "persecuted from the beginning". However, what we certainly do know is that generations upon generations upon generations of "blacks" were not only (merely, as you imply) persecuted, but reduced to servitude and deprived very important envirnomental factors that contribute to the growth of intellect. All due to that initial perception of inferiority. A view based on nothing. 

The data didn't exist then, it doesn't exist now. We know that genetics have something to do with intelligence, but we don't know exactly what. HOWEVER, what we do know about the environment we can control, yet we have not been putting forth any sort of earnest effort in this regard. Just look at the American education system. Lack of competition = stagnacy. Are you going to say that white Americans are genetically inferior to white Europeans, then?

As for people being afraid of what they would find, that's an ignorant statement. You don't know what the fuck people are afriad of. It's an assumption, which serves your ego and your argument.

You say that assuming people would be afriad: "Wow, blacks really are inferior!" - when honestly, the guys who wrote the Bell Curve could have avoided this maddness by at least attempting to put out a complete study in the first place. We all know why they didn't and why they ignored culture and society in their study. (Pioneer Fund Nazis, FTW)

And It's funny, societal taboos only exist in your camp when it suits you. You completely ignore the fact that 400+ years of blackness being a "societal (and cultural) taboo" could have an effect on future generations' intelligence- while at the same time citing "societal tabboo" as a reason one person wouldn't do an experiment on the genetic basis.

Even if you find negroid genetic inferiority in the latter, the reason for that inferiority is going to be because what we *know as fact* pretaining to the former.

No matter what: You will lose. There's not one side to intelligence and to make any purely genetic arugement regarding *anyone* intelligence is inherantly wrong and goes against everything scientific.