I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

I don't know why you insist on asserting that it bothers me that blacks are the same species, and are 99.99 percent the same as me. 

{We can help "black" children do better in school now. - But we're doing fuck all.}

Actually, we're doing all we can...  Trying special magnet schools in inner city neighborhoods ETC...  But it's really misguided and for the most part isn't working. 

{not even a 150 IQ can save you if you're black, live in the poorest neighborhood, and if everyone ASSUMES you have ADD and poor inhibition because you're black. }

LOL this is one of the most bullshit things I've ever heard you say.  a 150 IQ would most definately save you; it'd make you realize that you don't need to be spending your time in the ghetto, make you move out to a lower crime area, get a job and wal mart and pay your way through school.  Most people who sit in the ghetto and amount to nothing do so because they're dumb and ignorant.  A high IQ doesn't mean you won't be ignorant, but it'll make you MUCH better able to realize WHY you're rotting in the ghetto, and make you realize what you can do to combat it.  Most ignant giggaboos(sp?) just blame it on the white man and get back to rasin' the roof up in hyere!

And if you're going to play the racism card, I can just point out affirmative action and how most employers are scrambling for the opportunity to hire a qualified black person to fulfill their quotas. 

I don't even think you meant this point seriously to be honest.   I can't believe you'd be dumb enough to make such an asenine point.



{It's not racist to look into the physical component of IQ until you do so *BY RACE*. Are you having a hard time understanding that your oldest human ancester was a sub-saharan African? The same "race" (snicker) of people you automatically *ASSUME* to have a low IQ?}

Well, if the data's there then...

{Remember when I blasted you on your idea that "they just had knowledge"? }
You never blasted shit. (wasn't me btw, you're arguing with no less than three anonymouses here...)  A bushman has knowledge that's passed down for generations, and memorized.  A bushman isn't inventing the techniques for survival, just copying them.  Just because a white man can't survive in the wilderness doesn't mean that he has a lower IQ or anything.

Now, take the same bushman, and a suburban person, and put them both in the same environment that aren't like anything either have ever been in before, and whoever adapts the fastest and the best can be said to have done so because of IQ.

{LOL, you just hear what you *want* to hear, because you actually think you're searching for a way to help mankind. You're doing nothing but affirming an UNTRUE idea that has been perpetuated by white superemists and eurocentrics every since they ENSLAVED blacks and put them in this position in the FIRST place. }
Everything is the white man's fault, and we're such horrible horrible people. Maybe if they had been able to mount any sort of opposition to european power the situation would be different today.  You're doing nothing but perpetuating a lie, which might not even neccesarily be helpful (I'm still undecided on that, to be honest.).

However, you win for the use of the word niglet.