I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>431 Your oldest ancestor is a sub-saharan African negroid.

Actually my oldest ancestor was a strand of DNA floating in a pool of primordial soup about a billion years ago.  Your insistence that this is relevant only puts another nail in the coffin of your repetitive argument. 

And through it all you keep repeating over and over again your stupid asenine "THERE IS NO RACE BECAUSE IT'S A HUMAN INSTITUTED IDEA" bs even when I explain that it is and has always been exactly that; a way of grouping certain populations that have certain characteristics. 

And that among those characteristics can be genes for intelligence and other areas and brain function, and that those could have contributed to the development of certain cultures that select for intelligence etc...  (ghetto nigger culture prefers dumb people, but is it not conceivable that it's because everyone who founded the culture was dumb that it developed that way) Is completely lost on you.

You are just so incredibly brainwashed it's unbelievable.  And what's more, even though you seem (relatively) smart, you'll never get anywhere with your line of thinking, except maybe on some denouncing racism show on daytime TV.

>>432 What I don't understand is why do you ignore all the whites who aren't doctors, philosophers and quantum mechancics? What about their genes? Why do you assume they have better genes?

I don't discriminate, if you dumb and there's a law against dumb people reproducing, then it should universally be applied.  BUT such a law would always affect blacks more than whites.  Because they dumb.  At least more of they dumb in proportion to whites. 

And hey, then we'd only preserve the SMART blacks, and I have no problem with that.

What I don't like is your constant insistence that race doesn't affect intelligence, when it so obviously affects almost everything else.