I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

What proof do you have that my arguments make people feel good? First of all, I never made any assumption nor have I implied that there is no physical attribute for intelligence. Obviously, it's the brain and it's inner workings. What we do know, however, is that there are no definitive genes that determine intelligence. All gene work relating to IQ is purely theoretical.

Your opinion about how much intelligence it takes to survive in the sub-sahara is just that: An opinion. You say that it hasn't anything to do with IQ and is "just knowledge".

Well I have some really bad news for you; Dictionary.com's definition of knowledge:

knowl·edge  
n.

   1. The state or fact of knowing.
   2. Familiarity, awareness, or understanding gained through experience or study.
   3. The sum or range of what has been perceived, discovered, or learned.
   4. Learning; erudition: teachers of great knowledge.
   5. Specific information about something.
   6. Carnal knowledge.

Intelligence: The capacity to acquire and apply knowledge.

Seems to me that you just admitted that the pre-historic sub-saharan humans were pretty intelligent, no? I mean, obviously they understood nature and where to find food or the human race wouldn't be here.

It's not stupid to try and understand intelligence. But it is very, very stupid to infer certain things about the brain biologically based solely on our perception of it's output. It's important to indentify and quantify the *input*, as well. And you're right! "Show me (A) so I can think (B)" is indeed unreasonable. But this is not the scientific method by which we glean truth. You have been *shown* that "blacks" are "less successful" and you "think" the reason is solely genetic. Sorry, kid, but that's not science and there's nothing "spiritual" about it. You have to show *what* genetics "blacks" lack and why.

And No, you don't have to *understand* the V-tech engine in a Lamborgini into to see that goes faster than a toyota. But then again, you aren't merely saying "Whites are better than blacks." If you did, you'd just be a bigot so instead you mask it by saying they are better because of a *reason* (genetics). That is simply not true. You're saying that "whites" naturally and biologically have a better "engine" that blacks. But guess what? They have the same fucking engine.

(cont.....)