I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>349
What?  Oh yeah, maybe the hunter gatherer culture descended from africa, sure.  But stonehenge, the greeks and roman cultures ETC... formed after they left africa.

1.  I think the point is that x-grouping of genes or whatever the fuck your talking about precluded a certain group ever FORMING a civilization.  This is only verifiable by circumstantial evidence, but it's powerful nonetheless.
2. We have plenty of data to back this up.  For example, we can trace intelligence between sets of identical twins separated at birth, they usually have a direct correlation regardless of upbringing.  They have traced genes back through history that correlate to certain groups forming...

For example, the Ashkenazi Jews are a subset of all jews, and share an almost identical culture with jews at large.  They were very inbred, coming from a small group of people during the middle. This has brought out several disorders, including cystic fibrosis, that incredibly sick harlequin fetus disorder, etc...  But inbreeding also strengthened several genes that control intelligence, and as a result they were able to rise in medieval culture, creating the stereotype of jews as bankers, money-grubbers ETC...

Nowadays, 70% of jews are of the ashkenazi group. And it is the ashkenazis who are the stereotypical hollywood actors, the successful stock brokers and lawyers.   One example: fully half of all chess champions are ashkenazi, while the representation for other groups of jews is proportional to their population with the rest of the country.

http://www.futurepundit.com/ cross reference Ashkenazi.