Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2006-01-01 5:23

I have the internet you know.

http//www.google.co.uk/...

(note the absence of links and the stormfront link... wow what credible sources! (i am being sarcastic by the way, for the record i don't think stormfornt provides many credible sources...))

Afrocentric source.
http://www.blackhistoryjohnmoore.bravehost.com/moors.html

I think it's obvious who the real racist here is.

"I'd like to see proof of "less advanced". Proof of sub-saharran Africa consisting of only "Blacks"."

The lack of proof of civilisation, a landscape litterred with the archaelogical remains of stone temples, walled cities and palaces for instance, is my proof that negroes were astronomically less advanced than the rest of the world. Such achievements are present throughout South America. Even the psychotic conquistadores could not eradicate all evidence of their civilisation, and it was far behind technologically than the actual African civilisations I seem to be the only one discussing.

What I'm more concerned about at the moment was the rise of the Empire of Ghana in the 9th century. Why have you never mentionned this? It would have certainly put a dent in my preconceptions about the black race! However the empire of Ghana was short lived and failed to withstand a small invasion by the Almuhads in 1040 I think. The empire was destroyed, the Almuhads went home and their descendants returned to subjugate the peoples of west Africa once again once they regrouped and formed the Songhai. Why haven't you mentionned this? Don't you know anything about black history?

You will find the original source you provided containing no superficial evidence and discreditting the.. biased... sources you enjoy believing with some sort of... manic fervor.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/moors
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berbers
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/mo.html

Today's Morrocan racial make up.
Ethnic groups:  
Arab-Berber 99.1%, other 0.7%, Jewish 0.2% 

Today's Mauritanian racial make up (some 900 miles south along the west coast of the Saharra from Rabat (the capital of Morroco..)).
Ethnic groups:  
mixed Maur/black 40%, Moor 30%, black 30%

It says that these region is experiencing ethnic tensions.

"The country continues to experience ethnic tensions between its black population and the Maur (Arab-Berber) populace."

Maybe they are annoyed because black racist groups are stealing their culture!

Newer Posts