I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

What you're asking me to do is conform to an ideal that I feel has no basis on the reality of intelligence or race. I have actually over-stated the rebukes to so-called "Scientific facts and historical differences". What I find most distrubing is the habitual lack of debate concerning these points. Even more disturbing that the opposition continuously brushes away these points without so much as a singular factual response. Personally, I see this cognitive dissonance as the very core of the racist mindset.

You're under the naive impression that this is some "new argument" concerning race when, in actuality, it's a debate that's been going on since the Modern Superpowers' colonization of Africa. The issues will always be intertwined and no one will ever be free of the fascist ability to use this so-called information for their own personal gain or to insure that their world view "wins out" over the others. When you make a reference to blacks and Africans-- it's already far too late for that kind of talk.

Your statement was perfectly reasonable until the very end when you brought up "genes" again. Race itself, has no biological definition. IQ tests are based on nuture and have no way of absolutely gauging what intelligence comes from nature and what intelligence comes from nuture. Intelligence itself- when it comes to humam beings lacks an a priori definition. These aren't semantics...these are holes in your "Facts" that you simply refuse to address.

That's precisely why I think the way I do. Now, any other factors such as culture, social standing, environment...these are things that are far more reasonable and far more provable. And if the opposition didn't resort to the polarity of liberal/conservative everytime it comes to address these issues- showing a pointed interest in skirting around them completely- the so-called "liberals" would have no reason to call them ignorant bigots.

If you guys can go around calling "a nigger, a spade" then why can't we?

I think...

Fundamentally your approach to "the truth" is askewed. The opposition's ideas are based on this mutant combination objectivism and social darwinism. Your entire thought process is that of a capitalist or rather, an economist. You operate in "co-relations"- the "after the fact" theory.

You offer up these co-relations as facts or "truth" without taking into account and responding to all known variables. And when someone's not convinced- you accuse them of ignoring the truth. What irks me most about this scientific racism is that there's no true scientific method behind it...and yet the opposition spends so much time claiming "it's science" only to resort to this "liberal/conservatism" nonsense.

In light of all this, how could you blame me for not being convinced?