Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-22 20:18 (sage)

>>183
Except that no race was "nurtured" to construct civilisation, yet the black race failed miserably at this. What is this indicative of? Up until 1400 AD blacks had a minimal amount of hostility from invaders, compared to the invasions of the middle east by the Mongols and Timur, colonisation was a momma's tea party. Why did they fail?

Despite your fallacious attempts to thwart history they never had a civilisation that was destroyed by whites, the Mali and Songhai if anything took more heat from their arab neighbours. Once again nothing compared to the wars the arabs experienced. If they did have a civilisation rivalling the more intelligent races (10 million square miles of goat herders doesn't rival 5 million square miles of intensive farmland, castles, walled towns and cathedrals) why is there no archaelogical evidence left. Even the attempts by the spanish to destroy all evidence of the Aztecs failed. You can hardly walk through Mootxico without bumping into an ancient statue of a serpent!

I await your attempt to dance around these facts.

Newer Posts