I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>128

"Ancestry" and Genetic Race are two different things, to be sure. Just because a private company can provide a gene map of your ancestry doesn't automatically mean that ancestory itself has any links to intelligence. For the wide difference in intelligence you're looking for- it would require that all of these races of humans to in-fact seprate species- that is simply NOT the case.

>>130

Yes. That "environment" being culture. Culture has long since acted as a sort of feedback system and is mostly responsible for the further evolution of our neo-cortex and consequentally- our intelligence. I don't intend to explain away any of the copy-pasted jargon in italics- though I am curious as to how you feel that poses any relevace to say- the existance of a "black" or "white" gene.

Oh, yeah. IT DOESN'T.

As for "ignoring science", that's simply an outright lie. I have addressed everything you've thrown at me while you have simply glared over my responses- your idea that "Blacks" haven't contributed to philosophy and civilization has been proven completely bunk- you choose to ignore it because it shatters *your* world view. If there's something that you feel I haven't responded to- by all means- pull it out (of your ass).

The difference between you and I is that I've actually done my reasearch into the damage that colonization has done to Africans. It was European carelessness that unleashed AIDS upon Africa and the world. And I don't see how you can sit there and say anything to the contrary when, for instance, a country like Japan isn't exactly doing 100% OK socially and culturally. Anyone can see that the imposition of western (judeo-christian) culture has done irrepairable damage to Japanese civilization. And Japan was never even fully colonized, in that sense. Africa however was- if you can't see the co-relation between the two (or if you choose to ignore it outright) then it is simply from arrogance and an inability to own up to your ignorance.

The neo-cortex, while not a sole component of intelligence...is a very large component...taking up 2/3rds of the total mammalian brain mass, it is where we develop the ability for critical conscious thought and reasoning. It's because of the complexity of the neo-cortex that we have the complexity of the human brain.

Yeah and those philosophers that I mention did indeed go to universities- as for those people pioneering those ideas being white- yeah it's real convientant for your arguement seeing as how "white people" have spent the last thousand years subjegating the planet to it's own over-inflated sense of superiority.