I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>124
Your arguement keeps running into the wall of no race genes or gene groupings though.

And how would you know? I'm aware of the PC line that many scientists have taken, but I'd like to know their basis for this belief. Few people have had their DNA sequenced yet, so how can scientists be certain? Without a massive amount of DNA from numerous individuals from different populations, there's no way to sequence and statistically analyze if indeed there is no difference.

Different populations have different allele distributions, and the significant difference in appearance between and African and Asian indicates that there's a consistent differences in the genotype. Or are you claiming the phenotype is the result of the environment? How does that explain the appearence of children of mixed descent?

It's all culture.

Thanks. I'd never have figured that out on my own. Perhaps the environment too. Maybe even a bit of biology. Any other obvious tidbits you'd like to enlighten us on?

And I honestly find it hard to believe you spend any relevant amount of time in Africa.

First class! You don't agree with what I've seen, so clearly I wasn't there. What if I was? Have you been there? How would you know if I was wrong? Clearly reading some books has given you great insight!