I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

>>108
You are leaving out many grey areas, whilst I try to address them.

Jesus was arabic and the bible clearly states his mother was a local arab living on the eastern coast of the mediteranean, perhaps you are stating that god is negroid and you believe jesus was half black, though I take it you think I am another [insert political jargon here] and by saying jesus was black I will be somehow offended. Well if he were black I would have no problem saying he was black, just like I have no problem saying blacks can be taught to fly planes and some have the intelligence to become doctors, however jesus wasn't black, which is the reason why I oppose you on this. You have however parrotted dogma which seem to be the standard with afrocentric paranoid racists.

There have been fair IQ tests concerning ethnic groups in universities and other places where you will find educated people and by unbiased demographists. These books you can find in the library and are purely scientific and not steeped in any form of political dogma, except for a by word at the start recgonising the sensitivity of the issue. I can't remember the title of the book I found, but next time I am at the library I will note it down.

I didn't say there were no black philosophers, I said they yielded no or very few people who pioneered civilisation and I am right, for if there were any they certainly had no effect.

Mbiti, theologian, was born in 1969AD, not 1969 BC so could not have done anything to pioneer civilisation. The only benefit of theology is religion and the fact it causes people to question the world without superstition, which human civilisation has already progressed past. I am sure Mbiti is intelligent, but he is no better or useful than any other theologian, not a black Socrates.

Hountondji, prefers oral tradition, something which has held back every civilisation that preferred it to writing. Dare I say, she prefers oral tradition because she feels western writing is a form of imposing eurocentrism on African peoples.

Kante do you mean Kant? He wasn't negroid..

Wiredu, I like this man, if only he were born 4000 years ago, then this conversation wouldn't be taking place and Africa would contain a dense thriving civilisation and culture rivalling the rest of the world.

Bear in mind they have all gained an education in universities outside of sub-saharran Africa and from knowledge derived from non-negroid races.