Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm not a racist, but I am...

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-06 1:18

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2005-12-19 17:05

FACT: Africa has been raped of a majority of it's natural reasources. It's gold, it's oil. FACT: Africa has been raped of  it's natural people- who were displaced by a system of SLAVERY up until the last 400 years.

It hasn't been raped of the majority of its resources. Not even close. The mines in South Africa are still chugging along just fine, and they were never really developed anywhere else in Africa. Provide some authoritative data or publication that supports your assertion, because it counters everything I've seen.

It hasn't been raped of its natural people either. A few percentage points is rape now? And even if it was rape, it stopped _several generations ago_. The current African population is about 800 million. Why is New Zealand, with four million people, richer than most the 800 million combined? What the fuck are those 800 million doing?

it's time for you to own up to the nearly-unrecoverable damage constant over colonization has done.

Like what? Europe dominated Asia too! Where are they now? Oh, that's right, they're either economic superpowers or well on their way to being one. What about Africa? Bunch of warlords, dictators, and bushmen.

Amusingly enough, the world has been dumping plenty of money into Africa. As we can see, it's had little effect. It's not the West that can't take responsibility, it's the blacks who squander it. Where did all the money go?

Dude, the Apathied ended in the EIGHTIES. That's the end of the arguement right now. You're expecting Africa to do in 20 years what took most countries 50-60-HUNDREDS years (China)

Yes, it ended in the 80s... with a first world infrastructure. China, Japan, Singapore, India, and all the rest had to **build it on their own**. They didn't have factories, roads, telephone lines, hospitals, schools, and other infrastructure. South Africa was already there (they even had nuclear power!). Zimbabwe was already there. That's what I mean when I say the blacks got a functioning society on a platter.

But then again Africa is bigger that a majority of those countries you mentioned

And small in comparison to China or India. There are numerous examples of countries smaller than Africa, and a few larger, that are all vastly more successful. Why?

Newer Posts