I'm not a racist, but I am...

This forum is full of it, but it's all true. The facts are there. Maybe there is a little hyperbole, sure black people can become doctors, fly planes etc... I'm a reasonable human being, I was raised in a liberal environment. I have bullied before, but never been racist and I see bigotry as immature, however I can't escape the fact that they are indeed very unusual looking.

http://unicast.org/forums/forum.php?forum_id=1

"golly, niggers are hideous with their buck teeth, black skin and brillo heads. Egads."

Just do a google search for skull shapes of different races and albino black people... CAucasian and mongoloid skulls are about the same and both these races have obviously exceeded negrito races in culture and civilisation. Even the obscure native americans constructed early civilisations. Their hunter gatherers tribes only existed due to their isolation, deprived of the circumstnaces that allow for agrarian civilisation. Given another 1000 years after the SPanish arrived, and the Gulf of Mexico would be like the Mediteranean circa 1000 B.C..

Though I can't say the same for black civilisations, they were not isolated, theywere exposed to the Egyptians, who were arabic, im not one of these nuts who thinks they are white. I really am not a racist or even a far right conservative...

I can't contain what i think anymore and I shouldn't be afraid of expressing my thoughts. They do look so animal like, it is as if they are a relic from evolution before human civilisation. In fact that's what they are, the only tribal systems outside of sub-saharran africa left by around 1300 were in areas which didn't have much food. Yet in the rich jungles of africa they still lived in the stone age, never utilising the wide range of plants there.

I think the out of africa theory is correct and that blacks haven't evolved much whilst caucasians and mongoloids have had to deal with the ice age.

How should I approach these facts rationally? Liberals say I should just ignore them, conservatives say I should become a whtie supremacist nut. Surely there is another way? Surely there is a way to get society to accept these facts without sinking into depths of paranoia and stupidity.

Sorry anti-chan, but due to the sensitivity and corruption of this subject it has never really been conclusively proven than black people are more or less or of equal intelligence than other races. I have seen many sources and statistics concerning the IQ test aswell as 1 good unbiased source about intelligence and ethnicity and I would guess at best that educated non-negroid communities score at around 115, whereas educated negroid communities score less, but above 100. It seems that any community or section of that community unfamiliar with IQ tests scores about the same, for instance school boys in the hebrides scored the same as school boys in Jamaica, however educated Scots scored higher than educated Jamaicans.

Blacks can become doctors and pilots, no problem, I would say the majority of whites are equal to blacks in intellectual capability. I cannot say whether blacks are a standard deviation behind when it comes to critical thought, but there are very few black philosophers, scientists or general pioneers recorded in history. Arabs, Mongoloids and Whites all have histories steeped in fgamous figures, the Greeks, Turks and Chinese all yielded hundreds of inventors and such like. Again the native americans exceeded negroes with their knowledge of the stars, who's priests are forgotten. Each of these major civilised groups had a form of writing and complex method of intensive farming of some sorts, vital for the creation of an ancient state.

Clearly it is not unreasonable to say that negroes never yielded or yielded very few people who pioneered civilisation.

I would like to mention another key point concerning development. Even the most oppressed and wartorn nations attempted to develop a system of protecting their food and other resources, Africans had plenty of time, space and technology to do this. Even Africa's barren regions could concievably support large towns as the steppe peoples in Kazak and Dhungaria achieved, in fact this occurred in the great Zulu city of Zimbabwe, however this came 3800 years too late and was only due to influence to develop from colonial influences around the coasts. It's almost as if south Africa had traded with the east african settlements for millenia without any hint of thinking they could or should try to achieve something similiar.

Other peoples did this a lot faster, a flood of new technologies, deep sea fishing, bronze, irrigation allowed more parts of the world to increase their populations and form civilisations, but in Africa everything remained stagnant and for much too long. Eventually even the north europeans drained the swamps and burnt down the forests to create farmland. Africa was about as hospitable as Europe circa 3000 BC, Europe wasn't always acres and acres of lush farmland, it all had to be worked for.