In the fight against "TERROR" ...

is ignoring human rights and due process acceptable? How far can the line be pushed back?

Discuss.

>>59
Wanting to kill somebody out of justice for killing a little 9-year-old girl in the manner I described is the same level of evil as the evil committed by the original killer? I'd like to know how you'd deal out retribution for a crime of that sort... Hey yeah, I'm sure the guy felt a lot of remorse for his actions, maybe he should receive counseling. I've read he was a drug addict, maybe he should get tax-payer-funded rehab. Typical irrational compulsive compassion...

>>59
What would you recommend we do?  I agree that we shouldn't kill killers (just lock them up forever where they can get their asses pounded by sodomites), but not because I think killing them is a bad thing (it's money issues.)

I don't think that you suffer from OCCD, it's more of an inability to be flexible in thought...  Killing is ALWAYS wrong to you, even though the act may destroy something that would kill again. 

You have to understand that unlike most people, those who are able to do things like what >>58 described can best be said to be nothing more than the substance that makes up their bodies.  They see other people as objects, to be used, consumed, etc... and they don't understand why everyone thinks it's such a big deal when they torture and kill someone.  Those people need to be severed from the rest of humanity.

People who want to kill someone because he killed someone make me sick.

While I generally disagree with the death penalty, the motivation (perhaps instinct?) that many people have to kill those who kill others can be considered a self-correcting feature. We didn't always have a formal legal system.

He's a serial killer? *slit* Well, that's no longer a problem.

Oh yeah. Don't make up stupid terms, >>58. We have evidence for OCD, but OCCD is some bullshit politically-laden term you just made up as an insult. Good argumentation there, mate.