Are we all left-tards here?

Come on now.  Are we?  While I myself wouldn't look for bible-thumping republicans, I think we should at least have a few moderates or radicals like libertarians ETC... 

Or is it the disproportionate european population here?

>>155
Wait a minute... they instituted the program from the start with the intent of making revenue off of it?

>>161
I don't know what their original intentions were, but they're generating revenue off it right now. As I said, the assumption is that there are more young people (workforce) than retirees. And that assumption is still true, but not for much longer.

>>160
Because Finland has 1/50 the population? Also, it didn't profit massively from WWII, nor does it have as many natural resources.

>>152
You're right, and I hoped someone would notice. "Right-Wing" and "liberal" might mean something different in every country.

In my country (Spain), it means I like my country and don't want to fuck it up or break it, I don't like or ally with terrorists (yeah, left-wingers do), I'm conservative in things like fag marriage, I'm a capitalist who believes everybody should earn money according to their work (hard, useful, unique) and have equal opportunities, I support constitutional freedom, and it doesn't say anything about religion (I'm personally an atheist).

Spanish right-wing ftw! Us real germans like you guys. Ignore the loony feminist, women voted just because she was a woman.
Our women are turning into American women, somebody help!

>>158 Finland doesn't consider what you call "dead weight" to be worthless. They do not exclude the poor and the unemployed from social benefits. I know for a fact that their neighbour Sweden (#3) pays people to go to school.

>>160 The US, unlike Finland, or Number 3 Sweden, does so at the expense of massive poverty (with all the related problems). Why would you want to have poor people if you could be competitive without poverty? The answer is that US capitalism demands a highly exploitable workforce, and the business elite who run the country are all too glad to provide it for them.

>>165
their neighbour Sweden (#3) pays people to go to school.
Honorable. I take you mean university or college though. For primary and secondary school, it's easier and cheaper to just force them.

>>165
Fails for stupid.  The real reason is the vast natural resources.  I knew I'd get something along the lines of "vast exploitable workforce"

The two aren't mutually exclusive, >>167.

Our women are turning into American women, somebody help!

They're either ridiculously fat, or obsess about their weight 24x7 even if they're fine?

>>165 Finland doesn't consider what you call "dead weight" to be worthless.

You never had to deal with niggers did you?

>>169
I meant in bitching terms. But yes now that you mention it, obsess over weight too.