Bush discusses bombing Al Jazeera

http//www.cnn.com/...
http//e/...

They've been attacked twice before in the past, which the US military chopped up to accidental - which raises a few questions other than crushing dissent, like how many other $1 million accidents have they made with attacks on civlians?

This being revealed at the same time that Cheney and Bush are calling dissent unpatriotic and hurtful to the war is something that shouldn't be dropping off the front page. And yet, it is.

>>9
Is this really what the world has come to? Are we so conditioned to disbelieve anything not fully supported by the world's governments and their medias that it's striked as a conspiracy theory because it was silenced before it could be fully released?

I don't jump on the back of just any 'bush punching bag' just because it exists. The amount of evidence of violence and abuse against the press in Iraq is staggering, and you're throwing the whole thing out because a tabloid dropped it? The information is proven to be leaked by two UK government sources, has been quoted to be true by two anonymous government sources. This is also the first time that the UK has used their secrecy act to silence something, even after the dozens of leaks that occurred across the UK in the duration of the war.

Is it indifference to the plight of the free press in Iraq, or are you making a genuine effort to deny all sure evidence that Bush said this? Massive conspiracy theories? That's like calling another abuse scandal leak a paranoia dream because there's no images and official documents to back it up. You people are retarded. If you hate Iraq just say so, but don't dance around the fucking bush.