Chivalry and Feminism

"I. To live one's life so that it is worthy of respect and honor by all.
1.Fair Play
Never attack an unarmed foe.
Never charge an unhorsed opponent.
Never attack from behind
Avoid cheating
Avoid torture

2.Nobility
Exhibit self-discipline
Show respect to authority
Obey the law
Administer justice
Administer mercy
Protect the innocent
Respect women

3.Valor
Exhibit courage in word and deed
Avenge the wronged
Defend the weak and innocent
Fight with honor
Never abandon a friend, ally, or noble cause

4.Honor
Always keep one's word of honor
Always maintain one's principles
Never betray a confidence or comrade
Avoid deception
Respect life

5.Courtesy
Exhibit manners
Be polite and attentive
Respectful of host, authority, honor, and women

6.Loyalty
To God, Sovereign, Country, and the codes of Chivalry
Always respect and obey the law unless the law is wrongful
Always be kind and never cruel
Give mercy to those that ask for it
Always be truthful and never lie
Defend the Law of Good, and seek to stop injustice
Have compassion to the weak, frail, and oppressed, and seek to help them in any way
Be charitable to others and give to those in need
Always succor women when they are in distress
Love your country, family, religion, and uphold them in any way
Always put the needs of others above the needs of yourself
Live a pure and noble life."


I think that the family is the core of society, and chivalry is the core of the famliy. But modern feminism is now about teaching women, and men as well, that men are neither needed or wanted. I think feminism in that manner is getting way out of hand. There's plenty of single parent families, which is hard on the mom and the kids, because men are no longer taught the responsiblity that is their due. It's like ppl don't have their dignity any more...

So called "roles" in the family are getting turned around to where the woman is the worker, and the man stays at home. While I'm not 100% aginst this idea, I think that it isn't a woman's responsibility to perform that kind of role. Why? If anyone hasn't figured it out yet, men and women are different, and they are built to perform diffrent tasks that the other COULD do, but wouldn't necissarily be suited for. Of course the majority of women are capable of everything their husbands are, but does it mean that they should? Of course not. It just wouldn't be as productive. Sure, you can drive a nail in a wall with a wrench, but does that mean that it should be used like that?

What're everyone else's oppinions on this? Are any of you feminists that are aginst men being merciful to women just because they are women? Or are you gentlemen/ladies that are more accepting of this?

>>39

AWWWWWWWWWWW, </3


LOOK FAGGOT. IF YOU HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT BY NOW THAT YOU'VE GOT GIVE THOSE CUNT-JUICE SOAKED FUCK_COWS A LOVING BUT SERIOUS BUSINESS SMACK ACROSS THE ASS EVERY NOW AND AGAIN IT MEANS THAT YOU ARE GAY. YOUR GENES ARE NOT DESIRED TO PROPAGATE THE HUMAN SPECIES

PREPARE UR SELF

FOR GAYNESS

IN THE ANUS

>>39
Go and beat the shit out of him and save her. Be her knight in shining armour!

>>41
Is this life in the ghetto?

>>42

IT'S LIFE IN YO MAMA'S ASS-HO
YOU FAIL AT BEING MY NEMESIS
ANTI-CHAN ENCOMPASSES ALL EXTREMES OF HUMAN NATURE AND INTELLIGENCE
STRAIGHT OMNIPRESENT LIKE A MOTHER FUCKER

>>39
You've experienced the standard girl. They are that fucking stupid. Forget about them, your right hand is much better, and it has more brains.

>>1
tl;dr.

Just be nice.

Yes, even to feminists.

>>45
NO U

(Prays that it's the god of irony at work in this thread......)

>>47
Nani?!?

Fuck you women. If you want to be the dominant sex, go back in time and make your man clean while you hunt for mammoths. We were dominant for this long for a reason.

>>49

i think you quite misunderstand the purpose of feminism.

>>50
NO U!

>>50
You misunderstand the point of feminism, which is to tell women they are superior and oppressed so they give you their money in the hope you will make the government give them money.

49 speaks the truth

Feminists just make the life of guys difficult. Nowadays if you try to be chivalrous (sp?) as a guy, you are seen as some pansy and a sign of weakness. Some girls like chivalry but majority nowadays just either see it as an insult to them or like the guy has no clue wat to do. Yet if a guy doesnt be chivalrous at all, girls seem him as a bastard.

Same story when a guy compliments a girl.

>>54
Hold doors open for old ladies and ugly people, slam it in the face of pretty cheerleaders.
Both sides win!

>>But modern feminism is now about teaching women, and men as well, that men are neither needed or wanted.

WOW. before you go attacking feminism like that, perhaps you should read up on it a bit and/or talk to some real feminists about why they feel the way they do. you people are fucking idiots. the only people to have spoken any truth in this entire thread are >26 and >27. are there any other females on this entire fucking board other than myself?

>>56
You should hear what some of your fellow women have to say about that then. They'd rather eradicate all men from the planet and reproduce artificially than to live with males.

And does it really matter who's male or female on these boards?

>>56

>>25 and >>27, yeah, they are actually 100% correct. But still, the behavior of standard woman does pretty much fall along the lines that most men have expressed in this thread.

From my point of view (being a man), I don't see the behavior as completely biological- more actually of what society engrains into girls from the moment they step out of the womb.

However, I am getting fucking disgusted at the fact that whenever a man expresses a viewpoint on women, every set of titts feels obligated to come out of the woodwork and tell them how wrong they are. Do you really think we men don't know that "not every woman is like that"? Society makes males prone to some exaggeration regarding traits, but usually our viewpoints stem from some- albeit- observational truth.

The women and men who don't fit into the mold society creates are cheifly- homosexuals. Meaning: They'll never pair up with the opposite sex and pass down these values onto their children. It's one of the reasons why I'm for homosexuals having families, but that's an entirely different arguement.

>>31
Big hint: America is now type 1. Better trade in those pieces of paper for some silver before the end comes you guys. I give it only 30-40 years tops, if you don't plan to be alive by then you should at least trade that money for some good trippy shit.

>>32
A meritocracy is only as good as the belief system encouraging it. Unless it's some guy that grew up distilling shine, I won't trust any American with something like that, especially not one that silver-spooned his way to the top as many of the older companies are facing as their original creators die off or pass the reins to another member of the board.

>>56
U FAIL IT!

>>57
That's why feminists need to fuck off.

Chivary is dead, hardcore feminists killed it. Pure and simple. However, women nowadays are trying live the best of both worlds. On one hand, they want the equality for job and pay opportunities, yet they are enticed by what they were taught from school and films regarding males being chivarious and the women being the distressed maiden. Combine them both and you get females that want equality and have males practicing chivary but the thing is you can't have both together.

There will never be sexual equaltiy because males and females will never be equal, if they are equal then there would just be one sex. Feminism is basically the pinnacle of hypocracy

>>61
Its also because girls just want everything!!! No matter how illogical it sounds.

Feminists think that being different is being unequal, when being different can still make one equal to the other. Women should get treated differently than men, yes, but they should still get treated equally.

IMO, anyway...

women are stupid and deserve to be subjugated

I think women should run the economy and government and men should go out and fight and kill each other and the victors get to impregnate the women.

Power should be shared equally among everyone. Men and women should just drop the social role bullshit and get to fucking and squirting out babies.

>>65
Correct.
>>66
Incorrect. You are also gay.

>>65

BRILLIANT!

>>65
The academic community agrees with your conclusion!

>>69
Chaos theory implies otherwise.

Women are hot, men are not. Therefore, we need more women. So many that men can no longer see one another through the bountiful field of bouncy breasts. Or non bouncy, for you Not4 guys. ONLY THEN CAN PEACE BE ACHIEVED!!!
Hey, what kind of idiot thinks Muslims want to die for Allah anyway. That ain't why I'd blow myself up if I were an Islamic.

Women are hot, men are not. Therefore, we need more women. So many that men can no longer see one another through the bountiful field of bouncy breasts. Or non bouncy, for you Not4 guys. ONLY THEN CAN PEACE BE ACHIEVED!!!
Hey, what kind of idiot thinks Muslims want to die for Allah anyway. That ain't why I'd blow myself up if I were an Islamic.

>>72
We need more men and they must compete for the right to fertilise the female population. Weak stupid men such as yourselves with undesirable traits would be castrated and sent to work in the salt mines, I can see why you disagree, but it's the right thing to do, so you must agree out of morality and stop being so selfish. All I'm asking is that you have your penis sliced off and go work as a slave labourer.

>>73
Wow...

>>73
Doesn't sound too weak if he's advocating harems. I SMELL PROJECTION BY A LIBERAL FAGGOT. I bet you think Freud is hot stuff too don't ya, wussy.

>>75
He is advocating harems becasue he doesn't want to compete for his women as he knows he would fail and he is selfish. Maybe we should have more women than men, but I still think certain men shouldn't be allowed to spread their genes.

Uh, no. Historically harems have worked in favour of a few men (and a few more women). The majority of men lose out.

Why is it that when a ruler of a polygamous society is threatened and wants support from the population that he makes monogamy the law? It's because the majority of men want women too. There are a surprising number of examples in history of this.

Look at it this way: if you're a woman and given the choice between marrying a powerful man (even if he has multiple wives) or Bozo the Clown (who has none), who would you marry? Who will give you a better life and better chances for your offspring?

Polygamy is a nice fantasy of men, but the majority would be losers. Real winners get the choice women, sorta-winners get most the rest, and every other man has to compete for what's left.

>>77
Why not make it simpler and make the rulers women?

Because men want to call the shots, and they're bigger.

Historically that mattered.

>>77
Bozo the Clown is hott.