Chivalry and Feminism

"I. To live one's life so that it is worthy of respect and honor by all.
1.Fair Play
Never attack an unarmed foe.
Never charge an unhorsed opponent.
Never attack from behind
Avoid cheating
Avoid torture

2.Nobility
Exhibit self-discipline
Show respect to authority
Obey the law
Administer justice
Administer mercy
Protect the innocent
Respect women

3.Valor
Exhibit courage in word and deed
Avenge the wronged
Defend the weak and innocent
Fight with honor
Never abandon a friend, ally, or noble cause

4.Honor
Always keep one's word of honor
Always maintain one's principles
Never betray a confidence or comrade
Avoid deception
Respect life

5.Courtesy
Exhibit manners
Be polite and attentive
Respectful of host, authority, honor, and women

6.Loyalty
To God, Sovereign, Country, and the codes of Chivalry
Always respect and obey the law unless the law is wrongful
Always be kind and never cruel
Give mercy to those that ask for it
Always be truthful and never lie
Defend the Law of Good, and seek to stop injustice
Have compassion to the weak, frail, and oppressed, and seek to help them in any way
Be charitable to others and give to those in need
Always succor women when they are in distress
Love your country, family, religion, and uphold them in any way
Always put the needs of others above the needs of yourself
Live a pure and noble life."


I think that the family is the core of society, and chivalry is the core of the famliy. But modern feminism is now about teaching women, and men as well, that men are neither needed or wanted. I think feminism in that manner is getting way out of hand. There's plenty of single parent families, which is hard on the mom and the kids, because men are no longer taught the responsiblity that is their due. It's like ppl don't have their dignity any more...

So called "roles" in the family are getting turned around to where the woman is the worker, and the man stays at home. While I'm not 100% aginst this idea, I think that it isn't a woman's responsibility to perform that kind of role. Why? If anyone hasn't figured it out yet, men and women are different, and they are built to perform diffrent tasks that the other COULD do, but wouldn't necissarily be suited for. Of course the majority of women are capable of everything their husbands are, but does it mean that they should? Of course not. It just wouldn't be as productive. Sure, you can drive a nail in a wall with a wrench, but does that mean that it should be used like that?

What're everyone else's oppinions on this? Are any of you feminists that are aginst men being merciful to women just because they are women? Or are you gentlemen/ladies that are more accepting of this?

>>52
>>54
>>57
>>75
Etc...
I really hope you guys are kidding.
I know a lot of Feminists.  My mother was one, as well as many of her friends. My mother never said anything about being anti-male. She simply felt that women, as well as many races, socioeconomic groups, and religious groups, had been treated unfairly for too long and that it was unnecessary and idiotic.
While thinking back on her life, I can't seem to find the "OMG MEN = BAD DEATH DEATH DEATH STFU DIE" part.
Interesting...
Also, "liberals" don't agree with Frued. Stop making gross assumptions.

>>121
I think when we are referring to the feminists we are referring to the ultra feminists, the ones that think all men are pigs and dun deserve a place on this planet.

Feminists like you mum are a prime example of reasonable thinking.  What I think most of us are fed are the women out there who are demanding equality to the point where THEY are at the advantage instead of men as oppose to having a balance.

>>121
So you don't hate men, but if we go on a date and we have sex in a rush of passion without me asking for permission first even though you were wearing a short skirt tight top and kissing and rubbing up to me, it's rape? It's nice to think you are not malicious, but until you stop being a hypocrite unfortunately I'm just going to have to assume you are lying.

>>123
This makes no sense, seeing as how I have a penis, testicles, and plenty of bodily hair.  These factors, when put together with the fact that I have no female breasts, would surely help one to assume I am Male.
Also, in response to the "It's nice to think..." line, only a malicious feminist/very odd woman with no self-respect would do that.
Again, stop generalizing.
You all make women seem like horrible creatures.  The general consensus with me and my friends (male and female [including the feminist ones]} is that anybody who does that is fucked up and shouldn't be running around, humping dudes, screwing them, then getting them nailed with rape.  It's not right.  A lot of women view it that way.
So, stop generalizing.
Even I agree, ultra-feminists are radical, nonsensical, immature, etc.  But you'd find that with any group that is absolutist about their ideal and would do anything to attain their goals.  Al Qaeda, the KKK, and other supremacy groups are prime examples.
Word.

>>121
Susan B Anthony types are mostly outdated, the majority these days are screeching harpies like Amanda Marcotte. They think their gender is an 'oppressed race' and they're continuing the fight against 20,000+ years of "male rule"

>>125

You're an idiot. If you don't see that women have been oppressed- then sorry...cash in your sanity certification because you're taking a ride down to the MENTAL HOSPITAL FOR PSYCHOPATHICAL FAGOIDS. YOUR LIFE IS 178-HIT FAIL AND LOSE COMBO. A COMBO FROM WHICH THERE IS NO BREAKAGE.

We come from a world where a woman couldn't vote, own lands even have rights her own children. How is that not oppression? I'm a guy, who uses cunts as convienant fuck sleeves and even *I* know that. Do I sit there and DENY IT like some delusional jack off? No, I acknowledge it and get on with my life.

I DON'T KNOW WHO AMANDA MARCUNTTE IS....BUT YOU DO

BECAUSE YOU SUCK COCKS

>>124
Did I say you were a woman?

>>127
Look at what you wrote.
>>So you don't hate men, but if we go on a date and we have sex in a rush of passion without me asking for permission first even though you were wearing a short skirt tight top and kissing and rubbing up to me, it's rape? It's nice to think you are not malicious, but until you stop being a hypocrite unfortunately I'm just going to have to assume you are lying.

Looks like you referred to me as a women.

Wow, my first topic here, and it's already this big... cool. ^.^

>>126
Actually, back in the oldest hunter/gatherer societies, women had a greater importance than men.  They were the ones who got most of the food, and dictated what the tribe would do.

It was only during the rise of agriculture that this whole patriarchal society started.

Look, women try on personas (personae) like they try on clothes. It is only ever about feeling good, looking good, being admired, in said persona. At some stage of her life, it made her feel real good to "be a feminist." Now, it makes her feel real good to "be" something else. Which makes you understand that for women, "being" is "being perceived." It's no accident -- they have very little in the way of interior life, and necessarily define themselves by the attention they can get from other people, and by the stories they can tell to make themselves (they think) look good to other people. ~alonso

'You're an idiot. If you don't see that women have been oppressed- then sorry...cash in your sanity certification because you're taking a ride down to the MENTAL HOSPITAL FOR PSYCHOPATHICAL FAGOIDS. YOUR LIFE IS 178-HIT FAIL AND LOSE COMBO. A COMBO FROM WHICH THERE IS NO BREAKAGE.'

WAT?
TL;DR
poster is a neeeeeeeeeeeeerd

http://www.danasweeney.com/badboys.html
LOL feminists.

>>131
You hit the money there. That is what women do everyday. And they feel that they have the right to do that.

>>131
This is frighteningly true

>>131
That's actually a social pathology that transcends sexes.  The reason you have this perception might be that you are attracted to that kind of woman, if only because you at first mistake those personas for reality.

http://subvertfacsim.blogspot.com/

I used to teach business subjects at university and every staff member had to abide by the feminists unethical ethics.

Remember that the number of women in every Western university is artifically increased through feminazi sexual discrimination (woops, affirmative action). This means that the men who are better qualified to become the doctors that treat our ills and reduce suffering miss out on gaining those positions to less capable women.

For this reason I could never be comfortable trusting any female doctor (or any other female professional for that matter). We need to stop using any service offered by women other than sex because chances are good that they only hold the job they have because of their gender.

Feminists have taken control of academia to effect their dumbing down of the population to a level where they can hide their own lack of intelligence and skill.

>>138
fag, you can't handle a real woman

>>139
lol says the guy that is probably pussywhipped like no other. WHO GETS THE CHECK IN YOUR HOME EH? I'll bet you fifty pounds it ain't you mate.

>>138
My father works at a university.  Majority of the people there are men.
Nice try.  But generalizations like THAT don't go unnoticed.
Here's my major problem with all the guys using the "feminazi" term, and go around acting like fucking psychological gods.
We often project the things we don't like about ourselves onto other people.  Be it other races, other idealogies, etc.
From what I've seen in this post, we have a lot of men with security issues.  So what if women get fair and equal treatment?  Who gives a shit?  Does that really matter?
I'd say it's high time for them to get equal rights.  In every sense of the term.
>>140
Wow.  You read one line, you construe that.  Awesome.
GREAT TO SEE THE BRAINS IN THIS FORUM ARE IN FULL WORKING MODE, HURR HURR...

>>141
i know you are a woman because you can't even contruct you thought processes into an adequate sentence. NOW GO BACK TO THE KITCHEN.

"you thought processes"?

LOL
OK BUDDY

1-1,000
Same person

( )O( )

lick me

>>145
*licks you*

"I'd say it's high time for them to get equal rights."
I was in Florida for a few days, a couple weeks back.  I wanted to go to a gym but the nearest one was tens of miles away because the one half a mile away was a Curves for Women.  And that's when I finally noticed the problem.  We got gyms made for women only.  We got all kinds of organizations for women only.  If anyone saw the Super Bowl in its entirety they might've caught that Dove commercial asking us to donate money for programs to raise girls' egos.  We got the Comcast making ads teaching boys not to be violent against women.  We got shelters for female domestic violence victims.  Hell, in Norway there was this program that just started that calls for all companies to force half their boardrooms and such to be comprised of women.  You call this "equal treatment"?  Sounds more like preferential treatment if you ask me.

>>147
DESEGREGATE SAUNAS AND SHOWERS!!