>>26
Lets say I agree with you that governments rule for their own benefit; there is nothing in my argument which benefits from my own statement that governments rule for their citizens. But I am sure that goverments do not govern for the benefit of non-citizens, and apparently you agree... in which case your previous suggestion that the impotence of an anarchism to invade and massacre the citizens of other countries is in some sense a benefit. But now you've admitted that that's not even how how or why governments work. Huzzah, I'm glad we've discovered that we both agree.
Hey hey hey I won an internet fight!
"it's been a pleasure" =)