What's with this taboo on assasination that the US government seems to have? Why is it such a bad idea to send a covert unit to kill the leader of your enemies instead of carpet bombing the whole damn country, causing the deaths of hundreads of troops and civillians and costing billions of dollars?
Assasination is a fuck good idea! Why discount it in whole?
Name:
Anonymous2005-08-25 7:10
>> 5 and 6
Learn to speak fucking English. I'm sorry you're afraid of polysyllabic terms, which has led you to misuse them and criticise those who do not, but just because you slept through school doesn't mean I ought to have done so too.
Collateral damage is not equivalent to dead civilians. Collateral damage includes dead civilians and more. There is a reason why there are so many similar words and phrases in this language, and it is because it allows one to render a message with nuance, which ultimately will be lost on quasi-literate children like you.