What's with this taboo on assasination that the US government seems to have? Why is it such a bad idea to send a covert unit to kill the leader of your enemies instead of carpet bombing the whole damn country, causing the deaths of hundreads of troops and civillians and costing billions of dollars?
Assasination is a fuck good idea! Why discount it in whole?
Name:
Anonymous2005-08-27 17:24
>> 20
The uneducated masses also watch wrestling and probably approve of "genocide" against the towelheads. It's all besides the point... afaik, there is no on-going literal genocide in the world at this moment... and if you degrade the word to mean the accidental mass-slaughter of peoples of a similar ethnicity or religion or nationality or linguistic heritage, you open up the term to be applied to any and every war in human history. Haven't all invasions killed lots of civilians? I think so... have all wars been wars of genocide? I think not.
There are no genocides at this moment. Not even Niger or Sudan.