>>60
When someone is obviously and so blantly ignorant about a *particular* subject, I think they're impossible to reach and debate is futile. They shouldn't even approach the subject in the first place.
U know how an good argument is supposed to go, in this case however, I just don't give a fuck. It's not worth it sitting here arguing with a bunch of kids about *this particular subject*, understand yet? When it comes to anarchy there are two categories: People who read the right stuff out of a lust for knowledge and know what the fuck they're talking about...then there's those who *THINK* they've read the right stuff out of a lust for knowledge and THINK they know what the fuck they're talking about.
You can think what you want about my understanding of Anarchy, I really don't care. Saying someone "doesn't understand" or declaring their "impotence" to be "apparent" is an ad hominem attacks