At this point in time, we have the Downing Street Memo, Karl Rove's implication in the Valerie Plame affair, and a multitude of other shit on Bush. At no point has anyone ever been able to make this shit STICK on him in a meaningful way. So the question is, is there any particular basis, at present, for moving toward an impeachment process against Bush?
Name:
illclinton2005-08-13 9:05
>>26
yeah i gotta give credit where it's due- dems were fags. dems let the republicans get away with fucking murder for years- NO OPPOSITION. i think only one congresswoman voted against the war (back when the invasion was JUST starting in afghanistan), barbara lee from oakland (which means kucinich voted for it). but in the beginning i think everyone was scared shitless about terrorism.