At this point in time, we have the Downing Street Memo, Karl Rove's implication in the Valerie Plame affair, and a multitude of other shit on Bush. At no point has anyone ever been able to make this shit STICK on him in a meaningful way. So the question is, is there any particular basis, at present, for moving toward an impeachment process against Bush?
Name:
illclinton2005-08-11 5:17
Nah- nothing to use for impeachment. The Senate determines if a hearing can be held and Reps control both houses of the legislature.
I can empathize though: Rumsfeld signed a letter to Clinton with his cronies in 2000 advocating force in Iraq. Please remember: 2000 comes BEFORE 2001 and the attack.