>>20
exactly, it's the only answer.
>>Hello brainwashed american.
Hahahaha. No.
>> The colonials all wanted land, so they took it, that's the brass tacks of it.
I won't disagree there.
>> waah waah waah rights
Might makes Right. Even the rights enshrined in whatever law are only enforced, ultimately, with force (police or army).
>> such a war inevitable? since when? that's liek saying a war with canada is inevitable simply because they share the same landmass with us! you're so DQN my head spins.
Actually america has gone to war with canada, just as it has gone to war with mexico. Now who is DQN, ignoramus?
In the case of colonists vs the natives it was inevitable because the colonists wanted control of all the land.
>> waah waah waah birthright inheritance cultivation
the soil was extremely uncultivated - the (relatively) small, moving population simply didn't require agriculture on such a scale. So there goes your 'maek teh land good theory'.
You have a very strange notion of inheritance, and are confusing the descendents of either group with the ancestors who took land or had it taken from them. The people of today are not the people of yesterday.
Maybe if you were to use even more exclamation points and repeated, indignantly spluttered question marks I might be convinced.
>> This is the most half-assed cheap cop-out I've ever seen. You make americans look bad by enforcing a steriotype that americans are stupid, ignorant, never take responsibility for their actions, and will do anything to further their own ends.
Sorry, I hadn't realised that was your job.