Empire-like Stateform.

a empire is close to a perfect stateform, imho.

No President, no nothing on the top. Only the Imperator, and even he is only their when something goes fucking wrong in the country.

Basicly it's like this/should be like this:

No fucking Partys(forbidden).
People-->Directly elect Senat.
If their is a crisis-->Senat votes if their should be a election for a Imperator or not. If Yes-->People elect Imperator(Can be anybody except a Senator). Imperator stays on top of the state till he dies(NOT till the crisis is solved because this would cause trouble[Why? Well, because nobody can say when the crisis is over!].). Then the Senat has to revote if a new Imperator has to be elected.

When their is a Imperator election, people can chose to "Anti"-Vote. If their is a majority of Anti-Votes, their is no Imperator elected. This Anti-Vote should be available at every election.

oh, and i forgot:

murder has to be legal, but only when it happens durring a duell. for a duell to be legitim, someone from the state has to watch the duell, and both sides in have to agree to the duell. also, the imperator HAS to accept every duell.

also, everybody HAS to vote. everyone who won't vote would have to go into jail till the next election. then he can vote... or stay in prison.

>> banning partys prevents the build up of organisations that leave no chance at all for new ideas(Look at the U.S.. 2 Partys(well ok there are more, but they are so small that they have nothing to say at all.). Not much of choice that you have.).

Yes. Let's abandon the party system because OBVIOUSLY it limits freedom of choice, and replace it with - and this is the clever bit - a ONE PARTY SYSTEM! That way you can choose all you want, as long as you choose one party! Oh, there are Anti-Votes, you say? Well, that's sure as hell completely different from a two-party-centric democracy where most people choose one of two things, isn't it!

>> Also, the jailing shouldn't be till the next election that is from the same kind you got in jail for, but for ANY election. I think most people don't realize how many elections are held in every state, in every country, every single day.

>> On one hand, that sounds a bit less extreme, although really you should have mentioned it before. On the other... jailings for every single election, no matter what the importance? Isn't that a little extreme? I mean, what's wrong with just a fine?

>> Also, don't come with freedome of speach to me. If there would be any true freedome of speech even a 2 year old could watch porn. That wouldn't be good for a child? Well so think about freedome of speech again then.

He can, if you've got bad parents. That's not freedom of speech, though. Freedom of speech is about being able to voice your opinions, not deciding whether or not you want to watch porn. I can come with it to you all I like. In fact, I should come to you with a dictionary, so you can look up what things mean before you talk about them. It could help with your atrocious spelling and grammar too.

Voting is a form of freedom of speech, as you are expressing your view by voting for whatever particular party you want, or not voting at all.


>> Oh, and here we notice: If two dumbasses want to fight a battle of life and death(=duell) and we say "no you can't", wouldn't that be against freedome of speech(yes i know it says freedome of speech, but you know what i mean.) as well?

Well, I know what you mean. You mean something that the term "freedom of speech" has little to do with.

Duels have been banned in most countries because they are an incredibly stupid, violent and extreme way of solving disputes. You said it yourself: "two DUMBASSES want to fight a battle of life and death". A duel is over the top, is a terrible way of solving disputes (awarding victory over a matter to someone not by who has the best argument, or who is right or wrong, but who dies first), and also run the risk of causing severe psychological damage to relatives of the deceased (especially children). It's pointless and dumb.

>> "The best argument against democracy is a five-minute talk with the average voter."

Democracy isn't perfect, yes, but one huge plus is that it generally stops elitist idiots like you from getting into power. It is one of the fairest systems we have, even if it isn't perfect. Your system guarantees the eventual electing to power of a power-abusive tyrant who would do far more damage to the country than democracy could ever do. Like I said, if you posted this to fix things in it, you need a HUGE overhaul of this badly thought-out garbage.