Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Anonymous has found God!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-17 10:54

So apparently the hacker group Anonymous, has found God.

http://vimeo.com/55671721

They're currently doxing Westboro Baptist Church for (among others) "desecrating the name of God" and "rewriting his sacred scripture". Anonymous boasts that "many of [them] are versed in the biblical text, and [they] can identify each and every of [the WBCs] violations of scripture". "We are everywhere, and all-seeing, in the same sense as God.", Anon claims. They even seem to think that WBC is a church that genuinely believes in God. Most of the internet knows that it's just parody, so this is obviously just some butthurt single moms at Sandy Hook. By the way, if you happen to live in Connecticut, show their video to the police and ask them to trace it so that we can have some REAL lulsy drama.

Of all the terror-groups to hijack the "Anonymous" name, I never expected CHRISTIANS to openly want to associate with the heartless cesspool of gore and CP that is 4chan, but I guess it's a way of discrediting Anonymous too.

Let this farce show that even fully fledged christian faggots, can use the Anonymous flag.

Name: >:( 2012-12-17 18:11

I found cum in my bum!!!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-17 18:13

What I don't get is why they're going after the WBC now? Is it because the whole thing with Scientology flared out? Because everyone has been critical of the WBC ever since they've made a name for themselves, so I'm actually a bit surprised that this hasn't been attempted year ago.

I never expected CHRISTIANS to openly want to associate with the heartless cesspool of gore and CP that is 4chan
I only browse /b/ maybe twice a year these days, but aren't there at least daily atheist vs. Christian threads on there? Sure those types of threads carry with them a lot of trolling, but I would guess that some people who proclaim to be Christian posting in them are genuine.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-17 23:00

>>3
They're going after WBC because WBC *SAYS* that they're going to picket outside Sandy Hook, claiming that Sandy Hook brought it on themselves or some shit. Yes, the Westboro Baptist Church are trolling assholes, so maybe they will too, because they've pulled similar shit in the past. I get why people would get pissed enough to dox WBC. What I don't get is why *Anonymous* would dox WBC.
1. The real Anonymous knows that WBC is a bunch of atheists doing it for the lulz. The WBC is basically the atheistic branch of Anonymous.
2. The real Anonymous regards religious people as so called "christfags". The christianity threads that you see on /b/ are blatant troll threads. You can not believe in a god of any kind, and still surf /b/. Not unless you want to cry over its godlessness.
3. This coincides with the Connecticut police claiming that "liars" about the shooting "will be punished". I'm starting to think that this may be connected.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 13:21

Yes we have. Praise the lord. May his hot white sticky "holy spirit" be sprayed all over your face. I want Jesus deep inside you. You aren't pooping from there right now. Not while God is there in the confessional with you.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 16:56

>>1 You are missing the wide range of understanding. The outlining concepts of Anonymous should be obvious to anyone with a basic form intellectual capacity. You do not possess any capacity to process how Anonymous stands as an organization. A claim to discredit West borro baptist church and all affiliates, is to begin decomposing the lucid methods in which their doctrine misconceives the nature of Christianity as interpreted by the Bible. Your simple comment questioning any response from Anonymous is void. No constraints permit the use of your simplified understanding of "the Anonymous Flag". The intellectual capacity of those who choose to perform or present a concept voice to collectively create Anonymous. I will seal this statement with advice. Watch your reasoning to discredit Anonymity for your misinterpretation by symbolic representation is distorted.


This posting will surely be the end to your wasted thread.





“We are Anonymous.  We are Legion.  We do not forgive.  We do not forget.  Expect us.”

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-18 20:55

>>6
The "outlining concepts of Anonymous" IS obvious to me.
To me it's simple:

You're cops.

You're corrupt officers of the Connecticut police department, out to pit two of your opponents against eachother. Either you created your own little cell of fake anons from scratch, or you used infiltrators to hijack an already existing cell.

Your cluelessness about both of these groups baffles me, so I gather that you have no ties to police intelligence, and that these illegal provocations are not backed up by the FBI.

...or maybe you're just some butthurt mom. For your sake, I hope it's the latter, because if you get doxed as members of the Connecticut police department, you'll have a scandal on your hands.

Get out while you can.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-19 14:22

Actually, we are still trying to reassemble that shattered hard drive so that we can prove that he has been here.
>>7

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-23 17:13

>>4
They're going after WBC because WBC *SAYS* that they're going to picket outside Sandy Hook, claiming that Sandy Hook brought it on themselves or some shit. Yes, the Westboro Baptist Church are trolling assholes, so maybe they will too, because they've pulled similar shit in the past. I get why people would get pissed enough to dox WBC. What I don't get is why *Anonymous* would dox WBC.What I don't get is why *Anonymous* would dox WBC.
Well, it's perfectly understandable why they would "dox" WBC. What I don't understand is why they haven't year ago instead. I'm guessing the whole Scientology/Project Chanology thing has kind of faded out a bit, so they're turning their focus on the WBC. But even still, I don't really understand why both couldn't happen at the same time.
2. The real Anonymous regards religious people as so called "christfags". The christianity threads that you see on /b/ are blatant troll threads. You can not believe in a god of any kind, and still surf /b/. Not unless you want to cry over its godlessness.
I'm skeptical of this often written claim that people who regularly browse /b/ are atheists. In an analogue to offline real life, in big cities you'll often find (but not always) a church around where lots of prostitution (both legal and not) and drug use are abundant, and the church either successfully or not are always out proselytizing to people, no matter what "filth" may get in their way of doing so. It's basically a Christian obligation to proselytize to anyone no matter what, although some denominations differ a bit on this. The WBC certainly doesn't really care if people join their cause or not, unless they consider their idea of picketing as a form of proselytizing, but I doubt it.
3. This coincides with the Connecticut police claiming that "liars" about the shooting "will be punished".
That really wasn't what was said. What was said was that people on social media sites like Twitter, Facebook, ect., who claim to be Adam Lanza and create fake accounts using his name will be prosecuted.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/newtown-connecticut-school-shooting-spurs-fake-adam-lanza/story?id=18000970
At a press conference Sunday, Connecticut State Police Lt. J. Paul Vance addressed the issue."Misinformation is being posted on social media sites," Vance said. "There has been misinformation coming from people posing as the shooter in this case, using other IDs, mimicking this crime, crime scene and criminal activity that took place in this community."Vance said, "It is important to note that we have discussed with federal authorities that these issues are crimes, they will be investigated statewide and federally, and prosecution will take place when people perpetrating this information are identified."
I don't believe they're going to criminalize "conspiracy theories" about the shooting, which would most likely run afoul of the First Amendment, however, impersonating someone and posting content under their name and identity I'm pretty sure (I'm no legal expert, though) would not be protected under the same free speech laws.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-24 8:26

Hi, I'm Adam Lanza, and the rumours of my death has been greatly exaggerated. I'm alive and well, and sipping some mango juice right now. I'm going to donate all the money that I got from my childrens organ harvesting raid, to the National Children's Leukemia Foundation. Why don't you do the same?
Merry Christmas, everyone!

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-24 16:41

>>10
Pretty sure 4chan/world4ch doesn't count as a ``social networking'' site.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-27 13:58

>>11
I second that notion. Role-playing is troll-playing.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-29 12:39

Seriously guys, how do I green text, red-text and blue-text here? I know you are illiterate Asians but this irritates me. Yeah, I'm mad.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List