>>1
Significantly LESS ironic than protesting censorship by effectively censoring random company websites off the internet with DDOS attacks.
The REALLY ironic part is that it's NOT censorship for Amazon to not want to do business with Wikileaks. Same for Mastercard, Visa, or any other company. And it's ABSOLUTELY not censorship for Sarah Palin, (A private citizen currently) to speak her opinion on the subject.
Regardless of your opinion on her or her politics, she's a private citizen, and attacking her website (and credit cards too, apparently) doesn't help Julian Assange OR Wikileaks. It just makes Anon look like a bunch of assholes.
Anon would be much more effective by trying to help Wikileaks stay online and available via some kind of distributed hosting setup on millions of private PCs, thus ensuring the wide and far distribution of the files in question.
But hey, what the hell do I know. I'm just Anonymous.