google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google google
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-02 15:59
In poor villages you can buy a baby girl for less than $100. Criminal groups just go in these villages, buy or kidnap babies and/or young girls, brainwash them using professional psychologists and then sell their bodies for mass profit. Since they have nowhere to go and are constantly menaced of being beaten up if they try to escape, they stay trapped in these rings while criminal groups get richer and richer.
>>6
Under the beauties of modern (i.e. unfettered) capitalism, baby girls have a market value and the market should by allowed to act on that value. There are no other concerns. If some bleeding-heart Liberals don't like that, they can try to out-bid the criminals (who won't be criminals, under true capitalism) for each baby girl. THE MARKET SOLVES ALL PROBLEMS, AND NOTHING THE MARKET DOES IS A PROBLEM.
Some of you might say that sounds disgusting, but I'm sure as SHIT that you fuckers have stock portfolios. YOU are part of the problem. So, how much of a problem is it? As long as you sit comfy in your Western home, we can sell and rape all the baby girls we can manage in order to keep up your profits. As long as you don't think about it too hard, everyone wins! (Well, everyone who matters, and that doesn't include the baby girls.)
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-04 8:24
Isnt that were rush limbaugh went with that bottle of viagra
you really are such a faggot, RC. Enjoy the AIDs you get from living in a brush hut with 14 fly invested goats while eating poorly grown cabage from your subsistance garden.
>>9
Yes, you're a faggot instead for owning stocks while the underlying corporations commit similar evils. Don't you bother to investigate the companies you allegedly invested in?
We don't have to choose between Hypercapitalism and subsistence. And for the fucking record, assjack, home grown veggies are turning out to be more nutritious than the corporate-farm grown stuff. Spraying nitrogen-based fertilizers is not enough, as minerals continue to be taken from the exhausted soils.
You really are a fucking retard ... do you know that? Don't post again until you get a real education, fucktard!
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-04 14:27
>>11
You truly are the definition of a liberal faggot. You think that if you're noisy enough and tell people that you're more educated you're right. Well fuck you. Really, just shut the fuck up. I'm sure you're proud you have a BA in liberal arts or English or something equally useless but your opinion can't be right all the time. Now go take a shower you dirty hippy.
>>12
I told you quite clearly not to post again with your uneducated drivel until you obtained a REAL education, from which you could qualifiably speak. If organized ed offends you, then all you have to do is set aside an hour each day for reading BOOKS.
So get the fuck on it and DON'T POST AGAIN UNTIL YOU BECOME CERTIFIED TO SPEAK. Your own ignorance is staggering and de-authorizes your viewpoint. It's so obvious that it's painful to watch.
If education is "Liberalism" to you, then I'd much rather be a flaming fucking Liberal than the uneducated screamer (like Rush Limbaugh) your class of knuckle-dragger prefers.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-04 17:30
>>13
No, I don't equate liberalism with education. But liberals almost always try to say the other side is uneducated when there is a disagreement. And you haven't really offered up any information on your educational background. And please do show us your certification for public speech. Just where does one obtain that certificate? I'd really like to know because I've always felt that another person or organization should qualify me first before espousing my opinions.
Seriously you're such a faggot. You are absolutely in no position to tell anyone not to speak. And I don't recall being much of a scream like Rush. But you certainly do seem to be as vocal as you can (on the interwebs lol) with your fancy caps lock and bold. Get real.
>>14 The facts alone dictate that you're uneducated. I'm just stating the obvious. Of course, deep in the deepest depths of your gayfaggotry, you can hardly admit such a truth.
Your certification to speak comes from your use of FACTS and LOGIC. You then hold your own in the public forum. When you DON'T do so, then you have to retreat in shame ... assuming that you even have the moral fiber to feel shame at being so uneducated, which you apparently do NOT.
Hence, given your DOUBLE fail, I cordially invited you to GTFO and read a few books until your uneducated opinion is corrected by education. So, what are you waiting for, assnut? ...
.G.E.T...T.H.E...F.U.C.K...O.U.T.!
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-05 0:31
>>15
Oh you poor bastard, you. You're probably under the assumption that I made any of the post prior to >>9
And that's why you're ranting and raving about using facts and reason, because you think I'm trying to argue a point some other anon made. But so far as I can tell my only contention in this thread is that you are a colossal faggot. The proof is here in this thread (and many others), especially with how you insist upon me being uneducated when you really don't know. Well I'll tell you, I graduated from a 4 year university with two degrees (accounting & finance). And soon I will have a Master's Degree in international business, from one of the best business schools in the nation no less. Care to offer up your educational background, RC? I dropped a hint in my last post that you might want to volunteer that information, but apparently you were too busy foaming at the mouth to notice. If you don't want to tell us about your 2 year associates degree then you could at the very least tell us all about these fascinating books you've been reading, these wonderful tomes of knowledge that separate you from Man and the rest of the wild beasts roaming this planet.
And I love how you simply failed to address the fact that your manner of debate is much more akin to Rush Limbaugh than mine is. But then again, that might be a little to insulting to Rush.
No actually you still remind me a liberal extremist who, when he hears or reads something he doesn't like, can only scream and piss and whine and moan about how the other side should shut up and be quiet. And it's faggots like you who are ruining the concept of free speech in America. So, once again dear RC, you are a colossal faggot, and no one one these boards cares for your opinions, no matter how many books you read.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-05 23:48
>>14
this is a funny thing to say, considering that the uneducated and badly informed are the most likely to toss around political words like "liberal" as an insult
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-09 17:36
Still waiting for you to tell us all about the glorious tomes of knowledge you've read....
Of all the mass imbecilities which have demoralised mankind, this of racial equality between all peoples, White, Black, Red and Yellow, is the most inane. Politically, it has already stirred up all the minor races into a state of belligerence and discontent which will impose minor wars on the dominant nations for years to come. But when it comes to racial integration between the White and Black races, sanity has descended to the looney bin of the impossible, because the intermixture of blood between those races must degrade the White race to the level of the Negro and cannot raise the Negro to the level of the White. Where today we see some evidence of the effect of education on the Negro it is the White blood in him that stirs some animation in his sluggish mental faculties, but the Negro pure, as he exists in Africa, cannot be educated even up to the standard of the lowest content of the White race. He may learn to parrot all the political and sociological clichés of today, but unless he is buttressed by the White race, and policed by it, he must relapse back to the jungle, which is his predestined habitat.
There appears to be an illusion today that this age is the first one in which the Negro has come into contact with a White civilisation, and so had a chance to benefit by its cultural and sociological ordinances. This is not the case. Since the genesis of this present civilisation some six or seven thousand years ago, the Negro has had contact with many past episodes of civilisation, but always, as each subsided, he has relapsed back to the jungle. The other three races, White, Yellow and Red, have devised their own civilisations, and have maintained them through the ages, but it is only in quite recent years that the Negro has come into relations with them. As in the past, his status has been one of slavery, because he has never been able to compete culturally with their achievements in the arts and crafts and intellectual standards. Nor can he compete today with those same achievements, because he utterly lacks the creative faculty: he has no thumbs. The only thing he ever learned to do was to smelt iron ore and hammer out his spear heads. That weapon was essential to the preservation of his existence in his tribal wars, and his food derived from wild animals able to defend themselves with teeth and claws.
Save for the Chinese, and other Asiatic peoples, all other civilisations were generated on the shores of the Mediterranean and the Negro penetration of them was very slight, except, perhaps, with the Egyptians, who were themselves a dark coloured race, but with no relation to the Negroid peoples. Only the Moors and Arabs, because of their geographical contiguity with Africa, have kept up the slave trade with Negroes, but sexual union with them was strictly prohibited. Or impossible for that matter. By a very simple clinical ritual, the Negro became a harmless guard and menial to the Harem. It is only since the colonisation of Africa by the British, Dutch, French and Belgian peoples that the Negro has become a momentous world problem within the last two decades. The British, French and Belgian peoples solved it for themselves by handing their colonies over to the Negroes. The Dutch could not do that. They had been so long in South Africa that they had built up another white race there—the Boers. And there, the world may be assured, they will remain, and the Negro will not be permitted racial equality with them. What must happen shortly between those peoples is already predestined. The only other country on which the full weight of the Negro falls is America.
And the Politician’s solution to it of race integration is a desperation measure which never can succeed, as the politicians themselves know, but at present, they dare not do anything about it, for President Johnson won the presidential campaign by handing himself over to the largest section of the community to command the vote, just as Roosevelt did to capture the presidential chair. We know that section, which is the pestilential problem of all peoples who seek to keep a sane balance of rationality in the conduct of their political and sociological affairs. In Australia, we call them Wowsers—a stigma word which Mencken incorporated in his American Language, but as yet Americans have not adopted it. A stigma word has great power.
In America the Wowser is the self-elected Dogooder—the temperance crank, the Purity Leaguer, the anti-saloon leaguer, the Comstock bookshop smasher and picture slasher; in short, that chapel product of the cheap suburbs and the rural back blocks which seeks to impose its own horrible codes and doctrines on all that makes life tolerable for well constituted humanity. They are the people who imposed Prohibition on America and very nearly wrecked the country. In Russia, they were largely responsible for the Revolution by cutting off the people’s need for liquor during the 194 war. They are the Pacifists—the peace at any pricers, the appeasers at any threat of war which thereby makes it inevitable by inviting aggression from piratically inclined nations. They are today trying to cripple Johnson’s handling of the Viet Nam war: the finest piece of statecraft since the great days of England as a world power, when half a dozen words from Lord Salisbury was enough to send Russia scuttling back from the Oxus. It is a great pleasure to know that our men are fighting with the Yanks, and that more are being trained to follow, if needed.
It is the Wowser, then, to use one stigma term for a generic type common to America, England, and Australia, who is doing all the mischief today by inflating the Negro with a state of megalomania which convinces him that he is the victim of monstrous injustice by the white peoples, and all revenges on them are his by right of martyrdom. And that revenge he will take whenever he has power to do so.
We must concede him injustice so far in that the Whites have invaded his country and taken possession of large sections of it. In the past, they made a commodity of him in the slave market. Those same Whites have now handed back to him the sections of country they had occupied and have freed him from slavery. Justice can go no further than that.
But America, swung off a sane balance of rationality by the maudlin sentimentality of the Wowsers for the assumed sad lot of the Negroes, has allowed its politicians to establish them in equal civil and social rights with the Whites. They have ordained that the white children must consort intimately with the black offspring from infancy to adolescence, and that alone insures sexual intimacy between the two races. That American mothers—always so passionately possessive over their young—should have allowed them to do such a noxious thing is evidence that they are too dazed by the bulldozing tactics of the politicians to realise its inevitable consequences. It is assumed that education will dispose of the physiological compulsions inherent in all such propinquity of the human species.
Education! This age has become besotted over its assumed potentialities to perform a universal miracle, which is that text books alone can create a civilisation. It ignores the irrefutable evidence that only a civilised mind can be educated. Education is nothing more than a procedure for exercising intellectual faculties which are a content of the mind at birth. It has taken the white race six thousand years to develop those special faculties on which all civilisations have been built. The craftsman’s fingers, the musician’s ear, the artist’s hand and eye, the scientist’s investigation of all natural phenomena are inherited from progenitors who have left behind them the brain cells, and the muscular reflexes essential to all creative effort. And it is now assumed that education, in a generation or two, will allow the wretched Negro to develop those special faculties and so allow him to compete on equal terms with the White race as a civilised being. Imbecility can go no further than such a preposterous assumption.
Already the Negro mass is in a vicious state of resentment because it has not straightway been vested in all the rights and privileges of the Whites. The Los Angeles episode is a sufficient evidence of a universal state of mind among the Negroes. And that is only the beginning of the trouble. When he finds that the higher-class whites will not consort with him on equal terms, and that there is no place for him among the trained working class, no police force in the world will be adequate to control him.
Americans are not a docile people when politicians impose arbitrary interdictions on the free conduct of their civic rights and their private lives. The politicians’ failure to inflict Prohibition on the American people is evidence of what they must expect by this proposal to impose racial integration with the Negroes on them. It only required an adjustment of the legal code to dispose of Prohibition, but no such adjustment can solve the Negro problem for them. There is only one possible solution to that, but I am not going to take it on myself to suggest it. It must be already pregnant in the minds of all higher class American thinkers today.