The federal government’s own crime statistics reveal that 90 percent of all violent interracial crimes are committed by blacks on Whites, not the reverse. Given that blacks only constitute about 13 percent of the population, a black person is 50 times more likely than a White person to commit a violent interracial crime.
Sadly, it's all too true. That's why all of my friends and most of my girlfriends are white. I live in an apartment for the elderly and disabled and most of the non elderly people here are drug addicts or people who got shot in gangs.
Black culture teaches selfishness, laziness and greed as it's three pillars.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-05 7:28
We see a similar problem where I come from;
A lot of small towns center their economy around one central factory. As one result, anyone trying to get an education beyond what's needed to work in that factory -- or, at best, a shop selling stuff to those factory workers -- gets to be clowned on for being "pretentious".
Then one (otherwise) fine day, the factory owner decides they can do this cheaper someplace else. Next thing you know, the whole town's going to shit.
Thing is, since the townspeople have ALL BEEN BRAINWASHING EACH OTHER into not taking an education, nobody's able to get much of a job elsewhere, much less start something else to bring in money. And (of course) those shopkeepers don't make as much money from _laid_off_ factory workers as they did from the _employed_ ones.
And what's this got to do with Black Americans? At least one important thing:
They too are brainwashing each other into only choosing between those 3 career types (basketball, rap, drugs).
And no, the media isn't exactly helpful; TV newschannels just LOVE to tell folks about Violent Blacks, Hollywood only ever seems to see blacks as good for one thing ("YO NIGGA, U DISSIN ME NIGGA? U GON _DIE_ NIGGA!")...
Summary: the system's been selling Blacks crap thinking, and the Blacks have been buying it. Two problems right there.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-05 12:29
>>42
In truth, the film industry avoids the violent black out of fear of boycotts. Instead blacks are placed in the hero roles. Same with the media. When a white person commits a crime it is splashed all over the front page. Maybe this is because Blacks commit such a disproportionate amount of violent crimes that it is not newsworthy.
>>37
believes the propaganda he is fed by Hollywood about them, because he's never been around them.
I can't help but notice in this thread, and every thread, all the rich Anglo kids from the lily-white schools, who have never lived with them, never worked with them, never been around more than one or two and that only rarely and for intervals measured in seconds, quite possibly never even seen them except on TV and in the movies, are the ones saying "i saw a black kid once for ten minutes when i wuz in teh 4th grade and he didn't do none of dat while I wuz lookin, u racist!"
Whereas those of us who have actually been the only white man living in the otherwise all-black apartment building, the only white man at the otherwise all-black job site, actually lived with and worked with nigs and seen TNB (that's Typical Nig Behavior, for those of you who rode the short bus to school) on a daily basis, are saying, "uh, no, we hate to burst your bubble and it must be very pretty in the happy magical little world you live in, but your beliefs have zero empirical basis in reality and stem from too much TV, too many Hollywood propaganda movies, and too little actual down-to-earth street reality."
This is absolutely nothing new. 150 years ago, all the East Coast city boy hack writers who'd never seen an Indian were writing hack novels about the "Noble Savage" who was just misunderstood and getting shafted by evil conspiring white men, while people who'd actually dealt with real Indians in the real world (Samuel Clemens, a.k.a. Mark Twain, for one, read his essay "The Noble Red Man" at ttp://www.twainquotes.com/Galaxy/187009c.html) knew them for what they were and universally considered them subhuman.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-09 15:22
>>43
>>Instead blacks are placed in the hero roles. Same with the media.
Bullshit. There are still more token blacks that end up dying than there are heroes.
>>When a white person commits a crime it is splashed all over the front page.
Bullshit again. There are lots of factors here. It can depend on how much the publishers need ratings, the fame of the person who supposedly committed the crime, the impact the cram will leave on the community, et cetera.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-09 22:14
>>48
Bullshit. White crime is a huge selling point. A handful of white boys shooting schoolmates gets 10X the coverage of negro and mexican crime because of the obscurity. There is so much negro crime that it is not news. What is the #1 cause of death of young negro males? Who fills the prisons? How many gang shootings vs. white shootings? Shootings by white kids is nearly nil.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-09 22:18
u can take the jig out of the jungle but u can't take the jungle out of the jig.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-10 2:21
>>49
Nah, it's because white kids, despite their privilege, go nuts and decide to shoot up the school in revenge. The psychological sickness is the angle that gets the press excited. Gang shootings are the result of joining gangs, which is a result of the socioeconomic conditions that black youth are forced to live with.
Name:
A. Wyatt Mann2006-02-10 3:20
>>51 Gang shootings are the result of joining gangs, which is a result of the socioeconomic conditions that black youth are forced to live with.
Ah, the old "it beez Whitey's fault I raped dem womens" argument.
COON, COON, black baboon,
Brutal, worthless, thieving goon.
Often high, thrives in jail,
His welfare check is in the mail.
Some 40 offspring have been had,
Not one will ever call him "Dad."
And yet he hollers day and night,
"I blames de WHITE MAN fo' my plight!
It's HIM spreads trash all round my shack,
It's HIM dat makes me smoke dis crack,
He push my kind to burn and loot,
And sends de po-leece dat we shoot..."
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-10 3:25
>>52
And part of that social environment is people like yourself.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-10 15:41
ugh.....
the racism is killing me
can't we all just love each other?
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-10 17:08
you guys seem to be experts at stealing tvs and such. where does one unload this stuff?
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-10 22:56
I put most of the blame on gang culture. Worst thing to happen to blacks since slavery.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-11 0:19
>>56
KFC and McDonalds have killed off more negroes than gangs and slavery combined.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-11 20:32
all niggers need to be euthanized.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-11 21:29
why am I seeing niggers with shirts saying "stop snitching"??
Fuck u fucking fuckfucks. U fucking racists need to fucking get a fucking life and get the fucking hell off this fucking site. Fuck U.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-20 23:43
mexicans are shitskin vermin that should be wiped off the face of the planet. In fact, I will try to run over the next spic family I see wondering around . Like playing bumber pool but with spics hahahahhahahahahahaaa!
Ever meet a mean ass Golden Retriever? I doubt it. Goldens are born wagging their tails and loving their human masters. If they look like they are smiling, it is because they are! Other than a few strains of fighting canines, dogs are happy and willing to please us. Were they always like that? Nope. Present day doggies are the result of thousands of years of breeding the perfect companion. Indeed, dogs are born liking people more than liking other dogs.
Negroes, however, never had the jungle bread out of them. As they are the most human-like animals, they are smart enough to cause trouble- which they do wherever they are. It was a huge mistake for the early colonists to experiment with domestication of negroes. It is impossible to breed out the evilness and jungle instinct in a few hundred years. The NIGGERS should have been destroyed once we discovered they could not function as free Americans. Certainly, nigs should never have been granted citizenship. That is like giving a drivers license to a baboon.
My suggestion? Kill all negroes and process them into dogfood, thus allowing them to finally provide something positive to society.
Name:
Anonymous2006-02-23 8:55
You see, as america was busy developing stuff, the negro was still confident in clubbing women over the head and dragging them back to their "crib" by the hair to engage in non-consensual intercourse.
Each item below is listed with its supposed black originator beneath it along with the year it was supposedly invented, followed by something about the real origin of the invention or at least an earlier instance of it.
BibliographyEmail
Traffic Signal
Invented by Garrett A. Morgan in 1923? No
The first known traffic signal appeared in London in 1868 near the Houses of Parliament. Designed by JP Knight, it featured two semaphore arms and two gas lamps. The earliest electric traffic lights include Lester Wire's two-color version set up in Salt Lake City circa 1912, James Hoge's system (US patent #1,251,666) installed in Cleveland by the American Traffic Signal Company in 1914, and William Potts' 4-way red-yellow-green lights introduced in Detroit beginning in 1920. New York City traffic towers began flashing three-color signals also in 1920.
Garrett Morgan's cross-shaped, crank-operated semaphore was not among the first half-hundred patented traffic signals; nor was it automatic as is sometimes claimed; nor did it play any part in the evolution of the modern traffic light. See Inventing History: Garrett Morgan and the Traffic Signal.
Gas Mask
Garrett Morgan in 1914? No
The invention of the gas mask predates Morgan's breathing device by several decades. Early versions were constructed by the Scottish chemist John Stenhouse in 1854 and the physicist John Tyndall in the 1870s, among many other inventors prior to World War I. See The Invention of the Gas Mask.
Peanut Butter
George Washington Carver (who began his peanut research in 1903)? No
Peanuts, which are native to the New World tropics, were mashed into paste by Aztecs hundreds of years ago. Evidence of modern peanut butter comes from US patent #306727 issued to Marcellus Gilmore Edson of Montreal, Quebec in 1884, for a process of milling roasted peanuts between heated surfaces until the peanuts reached a fluid or semi-fluid state. As the product cooled, it set into what Edson described as a consistency like that of butter, lard, or ointment. In 1890, George A. Bayle Jr., owner of a food business in St. Louis, manufactured peanut butter and sold it out of barrels. J.H. Kellogg, of cereal fame, secured US patent #580787 in 1897 for his Process of Preparing Nutmeal, which produced a pasty adhesive substance that Kellogg called nut-butter.
George Washington Carver
Discovered hundreds of new and important uses for the peanut? Fathered the peanut industry? Revolutionized southern US agriculture? No
Research by Barry Mackintosh, who served as bureau historian for the National Park Service (which manages the G.W. Carver National Monument), demonstrated the following:
Most of Carver's peanut and sweet potato creations were either unoriginal, impractical, or of uncertain effectiveness. No product born in his laboratory was widely adopted.
The boom years for Southern peanut production came prior to, and not as a result of, Carver's promotion of the crop.
Carver's work to improve regional farming practices was not of pioneering scientific importance and had little demonstrable impact.
To see how Carver gained a popular reputation far transcending the significance of his accomplishments, read Mackintosh's excellent article George Washington Carver: The Making of a Myth.
Automatic Lubricator, Real McCoy
Elijah McCoy revolutionized industry in 1872 by inventing the first device to automatically oil machinery? No The phrase Real McCoy arose to distinguish Elijah's inventions from cheap imitations? No
The oil cup, which automatically delivers a steady trickle of lubricant to machine parts while the machine is running, predates McCoy's career; a description of one appears in the May 6, 1848 issue of Scientific American. The automatic displacement lubricator for steam engines was developed in 1860 by John Ramsbottom of England, and notably improved in 1862 by James Roscoe of the same country. The hydrostatic lubricator originated no later than 1871.
Variants of the phrase Real McCoy appear in Scottish literature dating back to at least 1856 — well before Elijah McCoy started designing lubricators.
Evidence & sources: The not-so-real McCoy
Also see The Fake McCoy and Did Somebody Say McTrash?
Blood Bank
Dr. Charles Drew in 1940? No
During World War I, Dr. Oswald H. Robertson of the US army preserved blood in a citrate-glucose solution and stored it in cooled containers for later transfusion. This was the first use of banked blood. By the mid-1930s the Russians had set up a national network of facilities for the collection, typing, and storage of blood. Bernard Fantus, influenced by the Russian program, established the first hospital blood bank in the United States at Chicago's Cook County Hospital in 1937. It was Fantus who coined the term blood bank. See highlights of transfusion history from the American Association of Blood Banks.
Blood Plasma
Did Charles Drew discover (in about 1940) that plasma could be separated and stored apart from the rest of the blood, thereby revolutionizing transfusion medicine? No
The possibility of using blood plasma for transfusion purposes was known at least since 1918, when English physician Gordon R. Ward suggested it in a medical journal. In the mid-1930s, John Elliott advanced the idea, emphasizing plasma's advantages in shelf life and donor-recipient compatibility, and in 1939 he and two colleagues reported having used stored plasma in 191 transfusions. (See historical notes on plasma use.) Charles Drew was not responsible for any breakthrough scientific or medical discovery; his main career achievement lay in supervising or co-supervising major programs for the collection and shipment of blood and plasma.