I have been pondering this since listening to the Woodstock 99 album. I really hope there will be. I think for another Woodstock to happen, it has to involve less commercially successful bands to lower expenses.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-16 0:37
That would actually be pretty cool because today's commercialy successful bands suck ass.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-16 2:50
children.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-16 15:39
You know, you could just make a mix CD of bands who were at the REAL Woodstock back in the 60's.
WS'99, the portable toilets over-flowed, no outside food or drink was allowed in, 1 small bottle of water $7.00. Fuck yeah, i'm going to the next one scheduled.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-16 17:24
>>5
But what if the promoters claim to have learned from their mistakes? I would take the chance and attend. It looks like a great time.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-16 23:35
Only if there's dirty hippie chicks and lots of fucking.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-17 14:04
Yeah, I'm totally going to an outdoor event and watch shitty bands and dirty people flail their arms around and scream about stupid shit. Quite frankly, Woodstock would suck if we had one now because music today sucks.
It would be dirty, muddy, and there would be AIDS.
AIDSSSSS EVERYYYYYWHEREEEEEEEEEEE!
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-23 13:49
I hope not.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-24 3:46
Not if there is a god.
Name:
Anonymous2007-11-28 12:54
no because now most cops wont smoke pot with you they will beet the shit out of you and then take your weed and smoke it in there car plant the bag and make the arrest