We fail to understand or fully grasp that the most critical infrastructures of all governments, businesses and even banks require the global supply chain to function. Every single transportation network, the power plants and electrical grids, pipelines, refineries, water works, telecommunications…everything requires and are integrally connected to the global supply chain and with even a slight disruption, not to mention a systemic collapse, the entire system is effected.
The collapse will be nothing like 9/11, nothing at all, but it appears that you have a major problem understanding scale and consequences of such interactions of infrastructure when speaking about a collapse. It is also apparent that you don’t seem to have an understanding of some of the most basic principles of economics or monetary mechanics otherwise you would not make some of the statements you have. You are also making assumptions that do not follow reality, but are apparently based on some sort of fictional understanding of popularized books and websites concerning the NWO, but that is not what is occurring, nor has it occurred as you and others present. Like others, you readily give the elite far more credit than they deserve. Additionally, you seem to think that a group of men could actually control the global economic and monetary systems to such a degree of certainty that they could gain control without much trouble, but that has not been the case.
I am not simply talking about an economic dislocation that could be used to promote a hidden agenda of some elite group of people, what I am talking about is the very real possibility of a systemic global collapse of not only the economic system, but because of the interconnectivity, the entire global supply chain operations. Such a collapse would not only be far beyond the control of any group, but far beyond the control of all the governments of the world even if they could agree on what to do to control it. What is happening is not something that either can be controlled or would it provide anyone with any benefit, even the elite. The world, starting with the US, has been subjected to a fiat monetary system that has essentially created a productive serfdom, as I said. What that means is that the entire system, as it was created and implemented, it the vital centerpiece of all control over people. As long as the productive serfdom can be maintained and managed then the elite retain their power over the entire system, but if that serfdom can no longer produce as with a global systemic collapse, then all control and power is completely and absolutely removed from those who have wielded such power. The entire system has relied upon the fiat monetary substitution system for its power, for creating, as it were a productive serfdom of people transferring their labor into wealth and having that wealth stolen from them through a monetary system that was intentionally created to siphon that wealth from the people and concentrate it into the hands of a few powerful globalists, corporatists and Statists. Without that system there would be no power elite as we have seen evolve in the last 100 years.
I cannot believe that you are overlooking the most obvious consequences of what a global systemic collapse would involve. What I am talking about has nothing to do with taxes going up in the EU or austerity programs being put into place in an attempt to stave off internal collapses within various EU member states. It doesn’t matter who buys up the airports, the roads, the power plants or anything else when the systemic collapse occurs, all of that will be completely and absolutely meaningless in the context of what I am speaking about. The elite can buy, buy, buy but they cannot stop such a systemic collapse from occurring nor can they control it or benefit from it.
The fabric of the entire socio-economic system has highly critical inputs in order to produce and the entire system is only one step away from a complete failure, one weak link in a system that is filled with weak links. The entire system is limited, not by the total amount of resources available at a given time, but by the scarcest resources. In other words, it would only take one of the links in the chain to break to cause the entire system to suffer from systemic failure; this is truer today than it was back in 2008.
We tend to think that if something did happen like a systemic collapse that it would be only short-lived and things would get back to normal within a few days or perhaps at most a few weeks or months, but we fail to understand just what a systemic collapse would actually involve in a highly integrated society such as ours and the worlds. If we think back on the Lehman Brothers collapse, it was almost one of those events that could have easily reached a critical point where there resulted a systemic collapse. I say that because after Lehman failed there was, as we know, an almost instant response within the credit structure of the economic systems globally. Credit seized up throughout the banking system, which, in turn, caused disruptions within several other areas of the economic, including the supply chain of the world. It could have easily overwhelmed both governments and central banks to the point that there would be no way to even begin to re-stabilize the system quick enough to stop the contagion from spreading, we got very, very close to the dominos starting to smack down one after another.
Few people seem to understand that the global economic system today has very few, precious few redundancies, as such the entire economic is basically one-dimensional and makes interdependency, as well as interconnectivity some of the weakest links in the entire system. The entire global economic is totally dependent, for instance, on a fiat monetary system that has been crafted around an even more risky type of system called the fractional reserve banking system and credit expansion. This system is the center of all proxy-wealth held by most people in the world, particularly those who invest their money in financial instruments such as stocks and bonds and other more eclectic securities. They are all forms of proxy-wealth, but not real asset wealth. If you have ever heard of a paper-millionaire then you know it is a person who has most of his wealth tied up in some sort of commercial paper or government bond or stock.
For instance, let’s take Bill Gates, the vast majority of his wealth is in stock, that is nothing more than a form of proxy-wealth, but let’s say that he holds several millions in cash otherwise known as fiat money substitutes, that too is nothing more than proxy-wealth, then let’s say that he is wise enough to actually hold a couple of million in gold and silver as hard assets. What happens to those various forms of wealth during a systemic collapse of both the financial systems and the global supply chain network? On paper Bill Gates is worth $61 Billion Dollars, one of the wealthiest people on earth, but in after a systemic collapse what would he be worth, well if all his wealth was proxy-wealth he would be worth zero, nothing, not one red cent. If he had a couple million in gold and silver before the collapse then he would have gold and silver but it would not be valued in terms of dollars any more. The same is true for every other Billionaire on earth if their wealth is based on proxy-wealth.
The same holds true for Carlos Helu, for Warren Buffett, Bernard Arnault, Amancio Ortega, Larry Ellison, Eike Batista, Stefan Persson, Li Ka-Shing, Karl Albrecht, etc. All Billionaires, all part of that very select, very elite group of people around the world, but for all their billions of dollars not one of them would be worth a single dime once a systemic collapse occurs.
Thus, I think you overestimate the power of the elite in the face of a systemic collapse and simply don’t understand just what it really would mean when it happens.