Save the world

There is a solution, but the problem is getting those 95% of the people to do it.
1 week is all it would take.
Day 1. Everyone withdraws their money from the banks.
Day 1 - Day 7. Everyone stopped going to work for that 1 week.
Day 1 - Day 7. Everyone stopped buying things.
The outcome? Governments, Banks and Large Corporations would realise who runs the world.... WE DO!
Who lives off what WE DO? THEY DO!
The only thing left to do is, live the old ways of sharing.

If you wish to take your money out but continue buying, only take the amount of cash necessary if you carry around hundreds of dollars all the time you'll just get mugged.

Take your money out of the bank. Watch those people in control freak out, if you have to order something just buy some card for paypal and use that.

http://www.nsa.gov/about/_files/CoreValues.pdf
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/military/nsa-police.html

>The National Security Agency (NSA) is developing a tool that George Orwell's Thought Police might have found useful: an artificial intelligence system designed to gain insight into what people are thinking.

With the entire Internet and thousands of databases for a brain, the device will be able to respond almost instantaneously to complex questions posed by intelligence analysts. As more and more data is collected—through phone calls, credit card receipts, social networks like Facebook and MySpace, GPS tracks, cell phone geolocation, Internet searches, Amazon book purchases, even E-Z Pass toll records—it may one day be possible to know not just where people are and what they are doing, but what and how they think.
The system is so potentially intrusive that at least one researcher has quit, citing concerns over the dangers in placing such a powerful weapon in the hands of a top-secret agency with little accountability.
>"The technology behaves like a robot, understanding and answering complex questions," said a former Aquaint researcher. "Think of 2001: A Space Odyssey and the most memorable character, HAL 9000, having a conversation with David. We are essentially building this system. We are building HAL." A naturalized U.S. citizen who received her Ph.D. from Columbia, the researcher worked on the program for several years but eventually left due to moral concerns. "The system can answer the question, 'What does X think about Y?'" she said. "Working for the government is great, but I don't like looking into other people's secrets."
>Unregulated, they could ask it to determine which Americans might likely pose a security risk—or have sympathies toward a particular cause, such as the antiwar movement, as was done during the 1960s and 1970s. The Aquaint robospy might then base its decision on the type of books a person purchased online, or chat room talk, or websites visited—or a similar combination of data. Such a system would have an enormous chilling effect on everyone's everyday activities—what will the Aquaint computer think if I buy this book, or go to that website, or make this comment? Will I be suspected of being a terrorist or a spy or a subversive?