Why the hell do you care about israel or palestine? even if tomorrow one of them were to be obliterated from the face of the earth, it doesn't effect malaysia even a single bit.
there's a bunch of stupid religion-based shit here in Malaysia that is more worthy of your attention.
for instance, do you know that it is illegal for Muslims to apostate from Islam? and that apostates are pretty much persecuted? why not pay more attention to this?
why do you feel the plight of Muslims living oceans away, yet you don't even care about the plight of apostates being discriminated by Muslims right here in ur own goddamn home?
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-01 10:14
>>3
try smoking pot in Malaysia. I double-nigger dare you.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-02 1:22
Fortunately a new, even dodgier online reference has arrived to fill the gap. Conservapedia (The Trustworthy Encyclopedia) is the work of American evangelists who object to what they claim are Wikipedia's liberal biases and mobocratic sensibilities.
The site looks and e-smells like the original, user-generated encyclopedia. But closer inspection reveals a disturbing parallel universe where the ice age is a theoretical period, intelligent design is empirically testable, and relativity and geology are junk sciences.
"Conservapedia strives to keep its articles concise, informative, family-friendly, and true to the facts, which often back up conservative ideas more than liberal ones," Conservapedia writes trustworthily in its entry on itself.
"Wikipedia articles may contain trivia, gossip, profanity, and even pornographic/sexually explicit images. The latter three are prohibited on Conservapedia and trivia is largely discouraged."
Hurrah!
I mean, boo.
I mean I have absolutely no idea what I mean which is likely to make me an ideal Conservapedia contributor. The site's bizarre word regurgitations make Wikipedia look positively scholarly (which is really saying something given the number of times vandals have inserted potty talk such as "poo bum dicky wee wee" into otherwise quite reasonable articles about Chinese monk fist boxing).
On Conservapedia, arguments are often circular, spelling is often unilateral, and grammatical and syntax errors flourish with abandon that is only the good, god-approved type of gay.
Contradictions, self-serving rationalisations and hypocrisies abound. Despite claiming to be superior to Wikipedia because it uses real names, Conservapedia lists someone handily called "Conservative" as an influential editor.
Administrator "SharonS" says her or his credentials include reading the Bible in a straightforward or literal manner, while "Jpatt" boasts that he has blocked more than 2000 "liberal fascists/trolls/vandals/racists".
If you're concerned you might be a liberal fascist troll, simply consult the definition provided by influential editor TK who says vandals (aka internet terrorists) are those whose intentions are to argue with and dispute conservative or Christian points of view.