>>19
What you're saying here is that rebellions cannot happen unless the CIA is somehow involved. CIA is somehow the glue that draws people together in large groups and makes them protest.
The protesters do have genuine concerns, though, intelligence agencies like the CIA inflame them largely to initiate regime change. Going to war with the various nations in the middle east is bloody, time consuming, and very costly. However, some of the people who run these countries know the game very well, and are much more difficult to dispose of, that's when military action is used instead (Iraq, Afghanistan, and now to a lesser degree, Libya and Yemen).
Similar things were done with the 1989 revolutions against communist regimes.
>>20
How is the Arab spring advantageous to the USA ?
Not just the USA, but also of the UK, France, Germany, Belgium, NATO, etc. When you dispose of the former regime, and install essentially a puppet regime in its place, you gain much more control over resources and goods than you would have had otherwise. The Arab Spring is playing out in quite a similar fashion to the 1989 anti-communist revolutions.
The Arab Spring I don't think will end Islamic theocratic governance in some countries, which is one thing I would like to see more. (Hey, if the CIA is gonna fuck around in other countries, at least they would have got one thing right.)