Scientists theorize that Tourette's syndrome, or the compulsion to do and say socially unacceptable things, comes from repression. Because 4chan has begun frowning on use of the word nigger, everybody who wants to say nigger now flocks to world4ch where there are no mods. Because he wants to express his displeasure with the savage African population in the US.
Let's face it, most social problems in the US are caused by blacks running rampant and acting like savages. It's ridiculous to argue against that obvious fact, so it seems unacceptable to ban use of derogatory language against these apes. Now, one may argue that it isn't the blacks fault that they're murderous scum with no morals, citing slavery as the underlying villain. This may be true, but it misses the point: one is not even allowed to criticize the blacks in the first place therefor the complexities of the situation never come up and hate festers from lack of free discussion.
The solution is to welcome discussion of how awful blacks are. Then the ones who call them niggers can be enlightened as to why the blacks act so violent and greedy. If we don't have open discussion we can never get the message out that slavery and the white man caused this. On the surface it looks like blacks are only semi-evolved while being fully-AIDS-ridden. If we don't explain the reasons behind these deficiencies it looks to the average observer as if blacks are just a failed species of ape, thus fostering racism in the minds of the young. Then we repress the racism forcing them to come to /lounge/ to spew it.
If this is a troll, then try harder. This one would be see through to anyone with half a brain.
If you're serious, get yourself on some meds and seek psychological help.
Name:
Anonymous2011-06-26 5:11
>>4
Not the OP but please explain a flaw in his reasoning? It seems pretty spot on to me, what am I missing?
Name:
Anonymous2011-06-26 5:21
>>5
I suppose it's debatable whether allowing free discussion of the trouble with niggers would lead to less racism. Niggers are so terrible that if everybody was allowed to discuss it, the hatred of them would intensify. Questions like "why has Africa been a shithole throughout history" and "why is almost every violent criminal in the US black" would have to be answered with more than a "tsk". Do you think tskman and his ilk are capable of that?
Name:
Anonymous2011-06-26 5:41
If we don't have open discussion we can never get the message out that slavery and the white man caused this.
How can the white man have caused it if they were already slaves to begin with?
Name:
Anonymous2011-06-26 5:53
>>7
By enslaving them in the first place? Are you retarded?
His racism is stupid. Also, it's not against the law in America to talk about racism or say what you want about blacks or any other demographic.
While I may agree that 4chan censoring certain words IS a bit much, I still can't see this reasoning for this post. He's still an idiot. Also, you don't have to say "nigger" to even get your point across if you want to be racist.
So, really, just calm your shit and see if moot takes down the wordfilter. All he's really done is start enforcing the rule of not allowing racism outside of /b/ which has been a rule from the start, albeit unenforced. There are a lot of other chans and sites to discuss racism besides 4chan. Actually, if you weren't a bitch, go out and discuss it in real life. Want to make a change? Then go do something about it besides spout NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER on 4chan all day long and bitch about it.
Once the start censoring words like 'nigger' and 'Republican', it will not be long before they go after words like PUMBLENUTS.
Name:
Anonymous2011-06-26 23:09
First they came for the niggers, and I didn't speak out because I'm not a nigger.
Then they came for the louts, and I didn't speak out because I'm not a lout.
Then they came for the VIPPERs, and I didn't speak out because I'm not a VIPPER.
Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me.
This is a GREAT thread. I'm glad we can have this form of discussion on /lounge/. I don't see why anybody would accuse OP of being racist, if anything he is too generous to African Americans (seriously, how long can we keep blaming "slavery" for the lack of evolution in blacks?)
>>28
Uh, my mom's dead? Bet you wish you hadn't spouted off like now, huh asshole?
Name:
Anonymous2011-06-27 10:55
I think it would help to minimize discussion on irrelevant stereotypes like the foods Niggers enjoy, or their ape-like thigh/gluteus muscles. Instead perhaps focus on the really glaring flaws, like disregarding authority and lack of motivation to attain an advanced education.
Name:
Anonymous2011-06-27 11:02
>>30
An this is a direct result of slavery because...
Standard liberal response. No matter what, all criticism and disagreement comes from stupidity, ignorant, mental illness, etc. When in reality it's LIBERALISM which is unnatural mental illness.
Liberalism is quite plainly a suicidal ideology, which suggests that children are unnecessary and get in the way of having "fun".
Name:
Anonymous2011-06-27 19:31
>>33
What? No, it's the conservatives who are always hitting their kids. You got it mixed up.
Us liberals love their creative spirits.
>>35
false RedCream, pretender to the name, vile and perfidious >>34
Oh come on, everyone likes to belt their kids, I don't care what their politics is. The world over, for all time, people beat the shit out of their kids. All races, creeds, and kinds. >>33
Maybe you haven't noticed: people have been breeding like rats. There are probably more people now than actual rats.
>>38
Nice try, ReadCream
And beating kids is great. It's even more fun to beat other people's kids so I don't know why you think only traditionalists do it. And there's no shortage of these fuckers either, so stop shitting your pants thinking that we'll run out.