/lounge/ - More Guns = Less Crime

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 11:17

Fact.

Name: VIPPER 2011-02-04 11:19

STOP! JEWS time.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:27

It's funny because it actually is a fact.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:30

Well, except for gun-related crimes.

By the way, do you mean civilian guns, or all guns? If we had a system more like Japans, I think that there'd be a significant decrease in violence.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:58

(*) (*)
(
^

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:00

Can you cite a study?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:26

http://www.pierrelemieux.org/artaubin.html
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/12/more-guns-equal-less-crime/

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:44

>>7
Those links don't hold any accountability. They are the equivalent of blog postings. I could link you to the huffington post showing how evil guns are. Please cite a neutral real study.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:09

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42167

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:10

>>7
apparently this Pierre is an economist who writes stuff for a living so I don't know if he's published peer review, and the second link is from the paper owened by Reverend Moon, the moonies weirdo, and is known for its political writers.
>>1,3
poor troll, a glib parody of USA citizen. what country are you really from

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:13

>>1
USA: full of crime and has the massive imprisoned population to prove it. so, more guns is only advisable in countries where most of the population aren't fucking morons.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:21

>>11
Live long and prosper, strong blue hand.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:23

>>8
Then I'd suggest the book, More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun-Control Laws compiled from a study by the University of Chicago. Also, http://www2.lib.uchicago.edu/~llou/guns.html

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:58

States with less gun laws generally have higher crime rates. But maybe it might just having something to do with the fact southern states are filled with angry hillbillys.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:29

>>14
States with less gun laws generally have higher crime rates.
^{[citation needed]}

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:55

>>14
There have been multiple links in this thread that suggest the opposite.

It's not as black and white as "guy has a gun so he'll kill people". That's a high school mentality on the situation.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:10

>>16

go watch "Bowling for Columbine".
Then come back and join the discussion.

Guns. Kill. That's what they're for.
And you don't even get a sporting chance like you would with a sword, or a bow and arrow.
More guns= more people killed with guns. It's not rocket science. Just think about it a little more, and you'll get it. I know you can.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:37

>>17
So are you 15 or trolling?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:43

>>18
what, if I'm not >>15 then I'm trolling?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:59

>>19
He's asking whether you're fifteen years old, numb-nuts.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:07

>>20

ahem. I knew that.
Anyway, no , not 15, not trolling... nice little derogatory way of talking there, >>18
Did you learn that from O'Reilly, or Beck?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:19

>>21
That post of yours couldn't have been serious, therefore I wasn't serious.

You've named a biased movie, others have posted links and studies. What does that show?

Re-read >>16, if you're like what I've described then you probably don't have the ability to form your own opinions, certainly not from having firsthand experience.

You probably listen to talk radio and watch too much television and movies and pull crazy thoughts from that.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 20:40

>>22
Ah, O'Reilly then. I see. How long have you had this conservative problem? We might still be able to help you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 20:50

>>23
I see you have nothing to say except mention television personalities who have nothing to do with the argument.

Perhaps you'd be taken seriously if you weren't so ignorant as to sort issues into political groups, which implies you follow a certain party and let it think for you.

Not everyone follows one of the two, which I assume you must.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 23:13

>>22 "links"
Here's links www.linksfrommyass.com

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 23:22

>>25
So you admit you were wrong?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 23:24

They keep bringing up television and media personalities in their arguments because watching what's produced from said personalities is more convenient than reading an 80-page university study.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 0:30

>>1-27
real Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 0:51

[b]TSK QUALITY[/b}

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 1:00

>>26
about your country being full of shitheads? NEVAH

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 1:10

>>30

tsk

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 1:41

This thread is like it was imported from /newpol/. Someone should repost it there, ought to be interesting to see the responses.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 1:46

>>30
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 3:44

>>30
and by the way your country sucks

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 4:09

Is this thread still here? Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 4:11

>>35
It has less shitheads fellating their doublebarrels than yours

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 4:47

>>37
You have more pinkpickle dicked faghoppers, though. Like yourself!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 4:48

PLUS you ignore evidence

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 5:10

No fighting in the war room!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 5:18

Why does such arguments on gun control degenerate into such awful heated contention?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 6:02

>>39
you were well-refuted and pretended that it never happened, jackass

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 11:34

>>42
Excuse me, but that was you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 16:44

>>43
That's some serious transference problem you got, jack.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 18:16

>>44
Proof is in the pudding.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-06 2:39

TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-06 3:04

more feotus = less pussy

More Guns = Less Crime

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 11:17

2 Name: VIPPER 2011-02-04 11:19

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:27

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:30

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:58

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:00

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:26

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:44

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:09

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:10

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:13

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:21

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:23

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:58

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:29

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:55

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:10

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:37

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:43

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:59

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:07

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:19

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 20:40

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 20:50

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 23:13

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 23:22

27 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 23:24

28 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 0:30

29 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 0:51

30 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 1:00

31 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 1:10

32 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 1:41

33 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 1:46

35 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 3:44

36 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 4:09

37 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 4:11

38 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 4:47

39 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 4:48

40 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 5:10

41 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 5:18

42 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 6:02

43 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 11:34

44 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 16:44

45 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 18:16

46 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-06 2:39

47 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-06 3:04