>>498
You fail to realize that there is a pattern to his scheme, which was to pick a digit every other two, eg. three digits abc in the form ax1x2bx3x4cx5x6
>>529
Hey, if he went looking around hundreds of digits before finding that sequence I wouldn't be so impressed. And patterns like that don't just occur willy-nilly all over the place. Don't you think he gets some credit for finding it at such an early place? Yeah you probably don't :/
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-31 9:01
>>530
I'd be more impressed if he went hundreds of digits in to find a GET. But then I'd probably just assume he made up the digits (who's gonna check?).
But yes, he deserves credit for his GET. Especially since it was original amongst all the equations, palindromes and prime GETs. I just wanted to feel like a big man.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-31 9:07
>>531
For your argumentative and analytic nature, good fellow, you will always be a big man to me.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-31 10:25
bewarethefriendlystranger.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-31 17:09
We're getting butchered here, where the fuck is Captain Autism's sagetank army???
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-31 18:18
oh no we're done for
someone flood this thread with nonsensical posts