How to "argue" with a lib

The best way to "argue" with a lib is to demand that all ambiguous terms be explicitly defined. When they start throwing words around like "freedom", "hate", "racist" and "oppression", ask him/her what exactly they mean. This will stump most of them. They'll either give you a half-assed definition that will be ridiculously easy to pick apart or accuse you of playing semantic games/beating around the bush.

I put argue in quotes because, well, you're not really arguing with them. It never gets that far.

>>1
so lib means USA teabagger Beckhole?  You guys are so weird with your teenage lingo and drugs

>>2
Is a retard and makes no sense and should read books more often. Shameful.

deliriants

>>3
non-sequitor.  I hear non-sequitors are the popular humour for USA teens these days (they have terrible parents).

>>5
Yes. And they try to be so funny by using them, but they end up being lame from trying too hard. Excepting their idiotic friends, nobody else laughs at their lame attempts at humor. This phase in a teenager's life often ends shortly after graduating from High School and entering the work force. There are exceptions, but usually that is the case.

>>5
I'm reacting

DILBERT   SCOTT ADAMS

Alice : "I GOT YOUR STUPID EMAIL WITH YOUR STUPID LINK TO THAT STUPID SCIENTIFIC STUDY.

I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR SO-CALLED "FACT." I KNOW I'M RIGHT!"

Dilbert thinking : "WINNING AN ARGUMENT NEVER FEELS LIKE WINNING."

www.dilbert.com   DilbertCartoonist@gmail.com

9-26-13   © 2013 Scott Adams, Inc. /Dist. by Universal Uclick

>>8 You got that right... which is why 4ct never admits I've won an argument against him.

>>9
Because you never have and never will....

And running away and hiding isn't winning.

faggoats bumping tard threads