could some genoius explain this thing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_violation

We need it to explain why we have the matter we see in the universe.

Just because.

And that's all I have to say on the matter.

Or Anti-matter.

>>1
child pr0n

It's funny because it says CP, which is widely understood as "child porn" on the internet.

lol, it seems pretty self-explanatory by the link you provided...where are you hung up at?

:/

>>5
just explain it, jeez!

>>5
5 jackson get!

I find it hilarious attempting to explain particle physics to someone who doesn't even understand the basic fundamentals of particle charge symmetry and parities.

Listen. All you have to do is read it, mark the stuff you don't know, mark seperately the stuff you do know, then review what you do know with current-up-to-date information, then go back and research all the stuff you marked that you don't know and find out more about that. It's that fucking simple.

Now, stop asking for the answers to the universe if you aren't willing to go and find out for yourself. If I were to give you something to eat, but you didn't know how it tasted, smelled, etc, would you still eat it? Most likely not. If it's not familiar, you will disregard it and think nothing more of it.
I swear, convenience breeds complacency in ignorant saps that assume they know it all when all they really know is the little bit they managed to recall when they were in lala-land dreaming up what physics must be instead of finding out what it actually is.
That's the pathetic state of ignorance. Sticking with what's safe, familiar, and avoiding pain at all costs. What a load of horseshit. Pain is a part of life, and comfort is painful to a living creature like humans. Don't like it? There is a sure fire-way to end your pitiful suffering. Just fucking man-up and get to it or shut the fuck up and dig in!!! SHIT!

:/

>>8
So you don't understand it.

Could someone who understands it chime in then?

>>9
☣ Please try to ignore troll posts! ☣

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/77139

>>9
The violation of the charge and parity transformations simultaneously. If you were to look in a mirror and move your right arm, your mirror image would move its left arm.

>>11
... -_-...yeah, in layman's terms, yes.

I've actually been studying this along-side my philosophy course on perspectives (point of view)
a person standing opposed to another person the right arm and left arm correspond, but in a mirror, the right arm is the left arm and the left arm is the right arm.
The purpose for significance in philosophy is perspective meaning we (the one individual) is not the only person perceiving.
You see, with mirror images and other people's perspectives...the time differentiation is slightly askew. One person's reaction (what is happening) is another person's perception of possible choice (what can happen) and yet another person's action (what had happened). Then there is causality.
Then there is, for mirror reflection, the time difference from projection of self to reception of reflected self. Even though there is a small seemingly insignificant variance...there is a variance.

Also, refraction.

Not the same...but they tie into one another.

:/

>>12
I'm pretty sure that particle physics is involved, because that's what the article is about.

>>13
lol yes! Everything large is derived from something small.

Jesus...

Fucking amateurs.

:/

>>13
☣ Please try to ignore troll posts! ☣

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/77139