I could say something racist, like, "All Mexicans were already criminals in Arizona. What else is new?"
But let's take a closer look here:
All Mexicans are NOT criminals under this law, only those who are in the state/country ILLEGALLY. This is the state enforcing a law that the fed has refused to do. The state of Arizona is not going to tolerate illegal aliens anymore. What is unconstitutional about that? What foreign national living in the USA illegally has civil rights under the US Constitution? Answer: NONE. Civil rights are rights written into law, and since the Constitution only applies to US citizens, foreigners don't qualify (except in criminal proceedings).
I think if the fed was serious about ousting illegals, it would allow state and local law enforcement to help in this situation, since the left's argument against getting rid of illegals is that they can't hire enough federal agents. Yet this law does exactly that, and all the liberals are whining.
And since there are illegal immigrants who are from countries OTHER THAN Mexico, isn't it racist to think that ONLY Mexicans are illegals?
If this law was truly meant to be racist, don't you think there'd be something written into it about blacks, too?