Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

What nothing is not

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-10 22:35

There is no nothing
nothing doesn't mean empty space
space is not nothing
vacuum is not nothing
nothing is nothing, and nothing is nowhere

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 0:45

>>40
Not the guy you replied to but I can tell that you think you know it all so will not entertain any other points of view in this discussion

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 1:08

>>40
Don't be stupid:  every word we use is language.  All I did was clarify the meaning of one word of the language, and then you go on and on talking some goofy shit about conception being limited by language.  What the fuck?  Are you trying to imply that you believe something about the word that you do not want to attempt to tell us?  What are you hiding?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 1:14

samefaging all over this thread tsc tsc

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 2:38

>>41
>>42
You guys seriously think that human words have the ability to describe reality in a meaningful, objective sense? The point is that you are wasting your time trying to apply words to concepts that exist outside of the human experience.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 3:37

>>44
Which concept would that be then

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 3:56

>>44
>>45
samephag

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 5:22

>>45
Nothingness.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-12 13:28

>>47
I'm sorry I do not understand you because you used language, DUHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Anyway, the topic is nothing, not nothingness.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-13 7:44

fail back to school, please.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-13 8:09

>>48
Anyway, the topic is nothing, not nothingness.
That is an admission that your thoughts on the topic are purely semantic, you are playing word games. That is child's play. We must find a way to communicate the realities of the universe through a conduit that allows for comprehension. Language is chain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-13 8:38

>>1-50 = same faggot

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-13 9:18

>>51
* same homosexual

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-13 9:21

>>50
I wasn't talking about "realities of the universe", I was talking about what the word "nothing" means.  Your belaboured point is that language is inadequate to describe reality, yet ignore that language is adequate to describe our own words.  The best evidence that you have for your assertion that discussion can't make you understand what is being discussed is your own lack of comprehension concerning what is actually being discussed.  That is, you are describing yourself more so than you are describing anything germaine to the topic.  Then you end off with some crazy "conduit" comment.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List