Think

I got into an argument with a friend of mine lasting an hour without reaching a consent. I told him a story: "a russian goes into a hotel and leaves 100$ on the counter saying that he goes upstairs to see the rooms, and if he doesn't like the rooms he will come back and take his money back. The hotel owner comes after 1 minute, sees the money ant takes it, paying the meat distributor that supplied the hotel restaurant. The meat guy pays the animal food guy that pays for his whore. All with the same 100 bill. The whore then goes to the hotel and pays for her room with the 100 bill and leaves. The russian comes back down takes the money and leaves. And thus, nothing was lost, nothing was gained, but everybody paid their debts." My friend says no this is not true, that a debt was lost somewere, that the circle is not closed etc. Who is right??? with arguments please

>>39
The hotel used the russian's $100 to pay the meat dude, so they're up $100 on that transaction, but $100 down on the whore's bill.  Noone has any more or less money than they should have, but the hotel owner and the russian are technically both thieves.

>>41
Yes, and the whore got a free room.

>>42
The whore spent the $100 that she got legitimately for the room.  Whether that money ended up in the hands of the hotel owner or not makes no difference to her.

Yea no difference to her but the hotel loses a hundred dollars for a room rental.

>>40
^* African Americans

>>45
You're an anus!

>>44
And gains $100 from not having to pay the meat bill.

.

?

!

・

（　・∀・）　Think!