Could he represent a demon or some other essence of evil who, completely knowledgeable of his actions, stands between the human race and a transcendent God i wonder?
>>1
How can I possibly be "standing between the human race and a transcendent God" when such an entity has no proof of its existence? And in any event, how transcendent can this entity really be if I can manage to block anyone from it?
The rich, heady aroma of FAIL pervades your poasting. Most FAILSOME are you.
>>5
lol. just because there is no "proof" (in the scientific sense) of God's existence doesn't mean God does not exist. In fact, it makes it more likely that he exists.
I'm sorry but I'm going to have to use your own words against you:
The rich, heady aroma of FAIL pervades your poasting. Most FAILSOME are you.
>>9
You're actually claiming that the lack of evidence INCREASES the chance that this entity exists?
LULZ! Get pharmaceutical help.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-10 22:36
>>10
try reading the post you're responding to before failing next time. >>9 said "proof in the scientific sense". There is plently of non-scientific evidence in support of the existence of God, the Bible for instance. Ever heard of that, Redcream? Ever read it? Maybe you should...
>>11
The poaster >>12 is correct. "Non-scientific evidence" is not evidence at all.
Also, I don't read that bibble or bayble or boble or whatever you Christfags call it, since it's a WORK OF FICTION that has no appeal to me. I may as well read "Roots" if some boring piece of stupid fiction is on the menu.
>>22
Are we talking about the same book? That description sounds a lot more interesting that what I was thinking of.
I like how people go looking for the book "Roots" in the history section of bookstores, just to be told its in the fiction section. {snrk} You may as well try to find Clavell's "Shogun" in the history section. "Hey, Sir, I'm looking for the movie 1941, you know, with John Belushi? Why isn't it filed with the documentaries?"
>>26
No, Scientology heavily relies upon a base of claims that has no support. Xenu? Thetans? What a load of fucking rubbish. There's no science being performed there.
It appears that you took the word "Scientology" and concluded that it has to do with science. You may as well take Christianity and believe it has anything to do with Christ. (Note that it does NOT; Christianity is all about MONEY and MURDER.)
Relevant links? Motherfucker, the fucking SCIENTOLOGISTS themselves haven't fucking provided the fucking relevant fucking links! Sounds like YOU are the BAWWWWer or whatever the stupid fucking shit you said there.
KRYYYYY MOAR BITCHES! Debate the facts or ACCEPT MY STATEMENTS AS TRUE.