RedCream is a fag

No other topic is more important and explains better the demise of our society than the saga of Mr. RedCream. I would like to start by discussing RedCream's inveracities, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that if we foreground the cognitive and emotional palette of RedCream's wicked conclusions rather than their pathology we can enter vitally into his world. Why do we want to do that? Because I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind RedCream that he should clarify his point so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, his proposed social programs sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense.

Since most people oppose RedCream's impertinent, immoral programs of Gleichschaltung, he has had to portray satanic, vindictive exponents of antinomianism as vigilantes using every ophidian means imaginable. Plainly stated, there are some simple truths in this world. First, RedCream's gift -- or genius -- is how effectively he's able to use lethal violence as a source of humor. Second, so far, the response from his camp has been tardy and equivocal. And finally, he likes to cite poll results that "prove" that he answers to no one. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to free RedCream's mind from the constricting trammels of mercantalism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality.

RedCream can go on saying that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life but the rest of us have serious problems to deal with that preclude our indulging in such slatternly dreams just now. The problem is, if he honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. For a variety of reasons, some strategic, some ideological, some attitudinal, and all of them wrong, pugnacious sandbaggers erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty. Worse yet, RedCream wants to turn nabobs of cronyism loose against us good citizens. We can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but I indeed hope you're not being misled by the "new RedCream". Only his methods and tactics have changed. RedCream's goal is still the same: to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to abet a resurgence of voluble irreligionism. That's why I'm telling you that this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about RedCream's foul-mouthed behavior but about the way that RedCream wants to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty. Faugh.

The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of RedCream. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I maintain that RedCream is a standard-bearer for the unbearable. That much is crystal clear. But did you know that I don't much care to share the same planet as RedCream? That's why I'm telling you that RedCream acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. In an atmosphere of false rumors and misinformation, the impact of RedCream's grotesque policies is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that RedCream is talking out of his posterior. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to RedCream.

When I state that nothing agitates and humiliates RedCream more than when I yank up anal-retentive, discourteous deadheads from the dark rocks under which they hide and flaunt them before the bright sunshine of public exposure, I'm merely trying to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. He accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his offhand remarks show nothing but bigotry. Why does RedCream make those sorts of accusations, then? That is, what meaningless self-inflicted psychological trauma is RedCream going through now? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: You'd have to be the town fool to contend that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the pudibund hands of stroppy slobs. That conclusion is not based on some sort of repulsive, pretentious philosophy or on RedCream-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that RedCream is unmistakably up to something. I don't know exactly what, but the last time I told his coadjutors that I want to drag him in front of a tribunal and try him for his crimes against humanity they declared in response, "But RedCream is a model citizen." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a surprise that some nugatory, insensitive swindlers don't have a clue. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would rip off everyone and his brother. I am referring, of course, to the likes of Mr. RedCream.

OP (I will give myself an identity)

No RedCream is still a fag, allow me to elaborate,

My topic is nothing new. However, since no one else has found it fit to address directly, I will address it here. First off, we wouldn't have a problem with racism if it weren't for RedCream. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, RedCream insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, there are those who are informed and educated about the evils of authoritarianism, and there are those who are not. RedCream is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why his vicegerents often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear.

For your information, if RedCream continues to make today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what he has planned for the future, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. While everybody believes in something, his simple faith in sectarianism will clearly cultivate the purest breed of irresponsibility. He has been offering crazy mafia dons a lot of money to eliminate the plebiscitary mechanisms which ensure a free and democratic society. This is blood money, plain and simple. Anyone thinking of accepting it should realize that RedCream avers that he answers to no one. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and RedCream are like oil and water. If I weren't so forgiving, I'd have to say that he looks primarily at a person's superficial qualities such as physiognomy and mannerisms. I, in contrast, consider how likely a person is to build bridges where in the past all that existed were moats and drawbridges. That's what's important to me. Either way, if he wants to give people a new and largely artificial basis for evaluating things and making decisions, let him wear the opprobrium of that decision.

RedCream's drug-induced ravings are a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia. Sounds pretty pathological, doesn't it? But is it any more so than RedCream's sinful, exploitative flimflams? Let's just ignore RedCream and see what he does. There is no inconsistency here; every time he tries, RedCream gets increasingly successful in his attempts to destroy our moral fiber. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well. He would have us believe that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of anarchism. Yeah, right. And I also suppose that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points? The fact of the matter is that my psychologist friends tell me that his whitewash of the issue offers no real analysis of the situation that resulted in his rude recommendations in the first place. Let me rephrase that: I am reminded of the quote, "His bedfellows are the carrion birds of humanity." This comment is not as impudent as it seems because if RedCream's analects get any more tasteless, I expect they'll grow legs and attack me in my sleep. Now that you've read my entire letter, I hope you've concluded that my plan to make a cause célèbre out of exposing RedCream's tricks for what they really are is deserving of serious consideration.