Name: Anonymous 2008-05-01 14:35
No other topic is more important and explains better the demise of our society than the saga of Mr. RedCream. I would like to start by discussing RedCream's inveracities, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that if we foreground the cognitive and emotional palette of RedCream's wicked conclusions rather than their pathology we can enter vitally into his world. Why do we want to do that? Because I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind RedCream that he should clarify his point so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, his proposed social programs sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense.
Since most people oppose RedCream's impertinent, immoral programs of Gleichschaltung, he has had to portray satanic, vindictive exponents of antinomianism as vigilantes using every ophidian means imaginable. Plainly stated, there are some simple truths in this world. First, RedCream's gift -- or genius -- is how effectively he's able to use lethal violence as a source of humor. Second, so far, the response from his camp has been tardy and equivocal. And finally, he likes to cite poll results that "prove" that he answers to no one. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to free RedCream's mind from the constricting trammels of mercantalism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality.
RedCream can go on saying that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life but the rest of us have serious problems to deal with that preclude our indulging in such slatternly dreams just now. The problem is, if he honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. For a variety of reasons, some strategic, some ideological, some attitudinal, and all of them wrong, pugnacious sandbaggers erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty. Worse yet, RedCream wants to turn nabobs of cronyism loose against us good citizens. We can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but I indeed hope you're not being misled by the "new RedCream". Only his methods and tactics have changed. RedCream's goal is still the same: to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to abet a resurgence of voluble irreligionism. That's why I'm telling you that this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about RedCream's foul-mouthed behavior but about the way that RedCream wants to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty. Faugh.
The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of RedCream. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I maintain that RedCream is a standard-bearer for the unbearable. That much is crystal clear. But did you know that I don't much care to share the same planet as RedCream? That's why I'm telling you that RedCream acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. In an atmosphere of false rumors and misinformation, the impact of RedCream's grotesque policies is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that RedCream is talking out of his posterior. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to RedCream.
When I state that nothing agitates and humiliates RedCream more than when I yank up anal-retentive, discourteous deadheads from the dark rocks under which they hide and flaunt them before the bright sunshine of public exposure, I'm merely trying to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. He accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his offhand remarks show nothing but bigotry. Why does RedCream make those sorts of accusations, then? That is, what meaningless self-inflicted psychological trauma is RedCream going through now? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: You'd have to be the town fool to contend that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the pudibund hands of stroppy slobs. That conclusion is not based on some sort of repulsive, pretentious philosophy or on RedCream-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that RedCream is unmistakably up to something. I don't know exactly what, but the last time I told his coadjutors that I want to drag him in front of a tribunal and try him for his crimes against humanity they declared in response, "But RedCream is a model citizen." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a surprise that some nugatory, insensitive swindlers don't have a clue. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would rip off everyone and his brother. I am referring, of course, to the likes of Mr. RedCream.
Since most people oppose RedCream's impertinent, immoral programs of Gleichschaltung, he has had to portray satanic, vindictive exponents of antinomianism as vigilantes using every ophidian means imaginable. Plainly stated, there are some simple truths in this world. First, RedCream's gift -- or genius -- is how effectively he's able to use lethal violence as a source of humor. Second, so far, the response from his camp has been tardy and equivocal. And finally, he likes to cite poll results that "prove" that he answers to no one. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to free RedCream's mind from the constricting trammels of mercantalism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality.
RedCream can go on saying that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life but the rest of us have serious problems to deal with that preclude our indulging in such slatternly dreams just now. The problem is, if he honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. For a variety of reasons, some strategic, some ideological, some attitudinal, and all of them wrong, pugnacious sandbaggers erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty. Worse yet, RedCream wants to turn nabobs of cronyism loose against us good citizens. We can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but I indeed hope you're not being misled by the "new RedCream". Only his methods and tactics have changed. RedCream's goal is still the same: to delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to abet a resurgence of voluble irreligionism. That's why I'm telling you that this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about RedCream's foul-mouthed behavior but about the way that RedCream wants to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty. Faugh.
The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of RedCream. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I maintain that RedCream is a standard-bearer for the unbearable. That much is crystal clear. But did you know that I don't much care to share the same planet as RedCream? That's why I'm telling you that RedCream acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. In an atmosphere of false rumors and misinformation, the impact of RedCream's grotesque policies is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that RedCream is talking out of his posterior. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to RedCream.
When I state that nothing agitates and humiliates RedCream more than when I yank up anal-retentive, discourteous deadheads from the dark rocks under which they hide and flaunt them before the bright sunshine of public exposure, I'm merely trying to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. He accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his offhand remarks show nothing but bigotry. Why does RedCream make those sorts of accusations, then? That is, what meaningless self-inflicted psychological trauma is RedCream going through now? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: You'd have to be the town fool to contend that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the pudibund hands of stroppy slobs. That conclusion is not based on some sort of repulsive, pretentious philosophy or on RedCream-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that RedCream is unmistakably up to something. I don't know exactly what, but the last time I told his coadjutors that I want to drag him in front of a tribunal and try him for his crimes against humanity they declared in response, "But RedCream is a model citizen." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a surprise that some nugatory, insensitive swindlers don't have a clue. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would rip off everyone and his brother. I am referring, of course, to the likes of Mr. RedCream.