Name: Anonymous 2008-02-11 15:14
A vision of a more ideal and perfect world -
It would certainly be better if we took over the world, or at least the United States, right? Then why is it that we let it be that people do not come to 4chan? People who do not come to 4chan are harmful to our society. This about 99.9% of all people who go on the internet. Among that 99.9%, more than 70% believe that pornography and the internet in general should be regulated. And the only reason why this has not happened yet is because of the Supreme Court. The U.S. legislature is entirely against internet pornography. In all other countries like Germany and Australia, they have already passed laws that would effectively ban 4chan-like websites to be hosted anywhere within their countries because they require registration which destroys the spirit of anonymous. And this is not a good thing. To say that one is in favor of pornography is political suicide. The only people who do not have a negative view of pornography are a small group of sex-positive feminists and 4chan. The difference between the two is that while sex-positive feminism shall remain limited to a small amount of people, 4chan can assimilate everybody within its culture.
How 4chan can gain political power is an easy matter. Surely if more people came to 4chan, say, between 60%-70% of all of the United States, then surely 4chan will become an important political force and pornography shall never be viewed as badly as it is now. The difference between 4chan being banned and 4chan not being banned is just a few supreme court justices that can be appointed by the president, and a conservative one like Scalia would surely vote for the constitutionality of a COPA-like law.
More people on 4chan means that this threat shall be averted, and the U.S. congress shall one day vote against a COPA law and allow 4chan to be and not have to resort to the Supreme Court to save us. And this is the only hope in other countries like Germay and Australia of getting rid of censorship laws.
It would certainly be better if we took over the world, or at least the United States, right? Then why is it that we let it be that people do not come to 4chan? People who do not come to 4chan are harmful to our society. This about 99.9% of all people who go on the internet. Among that 99.9%, more than 70% believe that pornography and the internet in general should be regulated. And the only reason why this has not happened yet is because of the Supreme Court. The U.S. legislature is entirely against internet pornography. In all other countries like Germany and Australia, they have already passed laws that would effectively ban 4chan-like websites to be hosted anywhere within their countries because they require registration which destroys the spirit of anonymous. And this is not a good thing. To say that one is in favor of pornography is political suicide. The only people who do not have a negative view of pornography are a small group of sex-positive feminists and 4chan. The difference between the two is that while sex-positive feminism shall remain limited to a small amount of people, 4chan can assimilate everybody within its culture.
How 4chan can gain political power is an easy matter. Surely if more people came to 4chan, say, between 60%-70% of all of the United States, then surely 4chan will become an important political force and pornography shall never be viewed as badly as it is now. The difference between 4chan being banned and 4chan not being banned is just a few supreme court justices that can be appointed by the president, and a conservative one like Scalia would surely vote for the constitutionality of a COPA-like law.
More people on 4chan means that this threat shall be averted, and the U.S. congress shall one day vote against a COPA law and allow 4chan to be and not have to resort to the Supreme Court to save us. And this is the only hope in other countries like Germay and Australia of getting rid of censorship laws.