>>7
I disagree. While there are probably a lot of people out there who would be quite content never to read another letter about Senator Robbins, these types of grumpy, ultra-domineering-to-the-core stirrers should be dealt with immediately. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care -- a large enough number to give Sen. Robbins a rhadamanthine warning not to defile the present and destroy the future. To understand why that affects everyone who has ever lived, you need to realize that one of his shock troops keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that everyone and everything discriminates against Sen. Robbins -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that my long-term goal is to introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on Sen. Robbins's impulsive manuscripts. Unfortunately, much remains to be done. As you may have noticed, Sen. Robbins doesn't care about freedom, as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him.
Have you ever stopped to consider the enormous havoc and ruin that has been wrought in this world by Sen. Robbins and his bootlickers? I have. That's why I say that I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that Sen. Robbins demands obeisance from his co-conspirators. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Sen. Robbins forces them to dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. At the risk of repeating myself, I must reiterate that he would have us believe that we should avoid personal responsibility. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Sen. Robbins is surrounded by deranged louts who parrot the same nonsense, which is why his philosophies are related to the elements and bases of resistentialism both organizationally and ideologically. At the risk of sounding a tad redundant, let me add that we must report as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding his money-grubbing codices. Our children depend on that. I feel this way because Sen. Robbins is not only immoral, but amoral. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete surprise that "obnoxious", "sullen", and "vulgar" seem the most appropriate adjectives to describe Sen. Leif J. Robbins's manifestos. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would subordinate principles of fairness to less admirable criteria. I am referring, of course, to the likes of Leif J. Robbins