Since I guess Sabre lost interest in not4chan and closed the site for good, 4chan should bring back /l/. From what I remember, the reason /l/ was separated from the main site was because it violated PayPal's TOS or some bullshit. But is 4chan still even using PayPal to accept donations?
Bring back /l/! I don't like the people at renchan. They're faggots. =/
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-26 6:53
"Hey guys, I get off to shota, but I'm straight as an arrow!"
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-26 9:35
>>1
This is unlikely to happen because moot is an idiot and quality boards is something the 4chan staff finds distasteful
I rlly tink dey shud get the loli back on 4chanz. I men, itz rly hot! I miss teh timez i cud jus come here fur a quick get-off... mabe we shud start an online petition to get it bak!!
(Oh an, hwo do i post anonimusly?)
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-27 4:12
>>9
You fail so wonderfully you remind me of real n00bs who type like that.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-27 4:24
Huh? I never said anything about shota
I was mocking some of the regulars on renchan. I should have specified.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-27 5:22
what are some good loli boards
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-27 7:14
>>12
There aren't any! Except for notkochan, apparently, which is basically just an immitation of not4chan. Normally I'd be ok with just that site, but they don't seem to be very popular, and the site is really slow. It would be so much better if 4chan just had its old /l/ section back again.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-27 8:08
>>12
there are tons and tons, but are japanese language. i had some links but dont have them anymore. they posted photos of real children, too.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-27 10:52
/r/ shota board, cause truth is that little boys > little girls.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-27 12:09
I doubt after the great neutering of /b/ there would ever be a lolicon board back on here... I'm not saying that it would be banish, merely not embraced. Lolicon is starting to fall into that "Grey Area" with some states deeming it illegal.
>>16
It's only now becoming a problem? Wow, I wonder what people thought of all the 18+ men who went there before? "Nah, there's nothing wrong with collecting pictures of girls drawn to look less than 13 years old. It's perfectly reasonable for a man."
>>16 >>18
There are plenty of sites all over the place, including paysites, that either contain lolicon or are completely centered around it. It is *not* a legal issue.
>>23
Sorry but I'm not a revolting, low-life pedo who’s worthless to society like you are. My life is actually worth something unlike yours. Please go kill yourself now, your kind disgusts me.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-27 23:16
>>24
I'm a kind of pedo(I get off by imagining myself being child and then getting raped, I think it's called autopedophilia) and I run succesful computer business. I bet I contribute hell lot of more to society than your slackering ass does.
>>24
Spoiler: most pedos are exactly the same and contribute just as much to society as everyone else (except of course for the fact that they're attracted to people who are underage lol). But I guess it's just a lot easier to imagine them all as 50-something year olds who live in their basements, rely on welfare checks, and only go outside once a week to visit the local playground, right? Oh well, whatever gets you through your day, I guess.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-28 1:29
>>31
Doesn't change the fact that you're sick animals that need to be euthanized.
We need to devise a test to filter you people out, and send you off to the incinerator ASAP. They say that pedophillia is caused by a mental abnormality; screening should be routine before ANYONE gets a job.
You people are subhumans who deserve nothing better than death. I don't give a shit if you haven't comitted a crime; the fact that you're chomping at the bit to commit one is worse.
If we only save one little girl from molestation for every 1,000 of you animals killed, it's worth it.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-28 1:32
As for why I'm at 4chan, I believe in chaos. I believe if you want to fight evil, you have to look it right in it's eyes.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-28 1:54
>>32
Because every man that likes mature women goes out and molests them on a daily basis, amirite?
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-28 1:57
>>32
GB2oven. There's no future for likes of you when new decadent generation takes over.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-28 2:01
>>34
Many would if they could. But women are stronger than little girls, and can defend themselves enough to be considered safe around normal males.
The problem is that pedophiles are not normal males. They are males who, through whatever twisted pathology desire control over something weaker than themselves. Thus, all pedophiles are potentially dangerous, and none are worth risking a little girl for.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-28 2:03
>>35
I beg to differ. Christians are gaining more strength day by day.
While I don't agree with chirstianity, I think that it will be useful for cleaning up the deviant scum which regular society is beginning to accept.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-28 2:09
>>36
Haha, I love people like you. It's so painfully obvious that you're angry at something you have idea about. You build up a bogeyman in your head and throw all your hatred at it because you have nowhere else to direct it.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-28 2:18
>>36
How do you explain then autopedophiles and those rare kind of pedos who seek to be dominated by little girls(those kind of guys exist really!) rather than dominating them?
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-28 2:24
>>37
You think so? Just take a fucking look at where kids today spend most of their times. In some shady websites and even furry hideouts etc. Then they almost exclusively hate christianity. They're so "goth" and emo, cause they think it's cool(which it's not). I'm not really sure if it's good thing, but I'm excited to see what they will grow up into.